Troy LaMont
Supporting Actor
- Joined
- Mar 11, 1999
- Messages
- 849
EE can be much improved by not actually looking at the screen. Its said to be completely gone if you leave the room.
LOL!
Oh, we're back on this topic again for the 5th time!
EE can be much improved by not actually looking at the screen. Its said to be completely gone if you leave the room.
LOL!
Oh, we're back on this topic again for the 5th time!
We might be blaming EE for the haloing when it could be a side-effect of another process.
It doesn't matter whether you call it EE or not. For US, it shouldn't matter whether it happened while doing the actual HD film transfer, the D5 to D1 downconvert or the actual MPEG encoding. For US, it also is irrelevant whether someone doing the transfer deliberately 'added' EE during the creation of the DVD, or whether one of the machines involved was responsible (which in the end means nothing else than that the machine developer is at fault).
In the end, it only matters that ITS THERE. And it makes the transfer subpar. And we want the issue solved. But they don't seem to be able to find what the problem is.
My anger is obviously not directed at you, David. Sorry for the rant.
Best regards
Bjoern
What makes us rant so much more on THIS particular title is, that:
1) This is Star Wars! They took their time to do it 'right' and had a HUGE budget to give us the best possible. They used THX to supervise the whole process. Yet its a flawed transfer!
2) Heck, i have DVDs from small independent Korean/Asian movies where the cost for the whole transfer, the equipment, the cost of the compressionists is probably in the range of a one day salary for some of the folks included on the behemoth Star Wars DVD project. Yet, the korean DVDs are 5/5 transfers without a single hint of EE or any other problems! I mean, how hard can it be then?
3) What makes me even more mad, THEY DENY IT. This is ridiculous. Not really surprising, though. If they would admit they screwed up, this would be a heck of a recall uproar.
4) Its THX certified. They actually pay THX to supervise this MAJOR title and they release a DVD with a SERIOUS flaw. That is exactly what usually should NOT happen if involve a 'quality control' company like THX. Yes, there is a chance that the HD D5 master already had the heavy EE in it and that THX only supervised the actual compression. But why don't they have the power to demand a new film transfer then? I mean, does it state "sorry, why weren't able to use HD master that didn't suck" on the DVD?
Bjoern is 100% on target here. That sums it up in a nutshell quite nicely.
And yes, the R2 is much better in regards to EE; check out the companisons on Bjeorn's website. Which, incedentally PROVES it's not source-related but rather an INTRODUCED artifact. I wish the Japanese would put out their own R1 transfer and code with R0. Then we just might have a DVD worth buying
-dave