here's the new font they used for the opening credits.
It may seem trivial to others, but I have an OCD about these things.
Yup, it looks beautiful to me. To each his own!
here's the new font they used for the opening credits.
It may seem trivial to others, but I have an OCD about these things.
here's the new font they used for the opening credits.
It may seem trivial to others, but I have an OCD about these things.
If it’s done well, it’s fine and gets around problematic dupes. There are many ways to skin this cat.Recompositing titles with original background photography is something that is happening more often these days. Disney has done it with a lot of their titles and the results are of course fantastic because the dupe footage has always looked bad. In the case of Disney however they still had the original titles and were able to digitally recomposit them so that they perfectly match the original production. Other studios are recreating titles which are close but not perfectly matched, which I can understand really bothers some people.
I wasn't going to buy it because I already have the 4K/Dolby Vision digital. However, I'm changing my mind.Is anyone getting this?
There is no reason to use a “new font.” ...
There will always be different frame boundaries, especially when comparing different capture mechanisms. A new digital image harvest should capture the edge of the perfs.I'm excited by what the comparison shows. The opening titles on the existing DVD and digital HD start the film off with less than stellar production values, including obvious stock footage with noticable wear. This is not true for the feature content. I will enjoy seeing the credit sequence with quality similar to the body of the film, since this is where the famous title song also resides.
I noticed there also appears to be some additional picture information on the lower edge of the new frames!