Bob Cal
Stunt Coordinator
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2001
- Messages
- 58
I would like some feed back from some Studio 40's and 60's owners. I just listened to both set for about 1/2 hour. (not much time really). The music was Santana and the store was using a Denon AV Receiver can't remember the model.
I found both sets really nice, but what surprised me was they sounded a lot different from each other. Now I have read that they have the same speaker setup in both , and the major difference was the size of the speaker themselves. I expected to hear a bit more base from the 60's but basically the same sound. This was not so.
The dealer was selling the 60's for $1079 Cdn and the 40's were approx $880 with another $200 for the premier stands, so they would cost the same.
I do not have a sub, so I fully expected to get the 60's before I went in and the added base delivered by the 60's would do until a year or so until I could afford the purchase of a sub.
After listening for only 1/2 hour I kind of thought the 40's were more open sounding. Now I am unsure what to do as I don't know if this is only on certain music. I would use the system about 60/40 for HT/Music.
I am 200 miles from the dealer so I could not take them home and do an in home demo, also it is not a trip I make every month.
I will be going back in 2 weeks with some of my own music, but I was kind of hoping the 60's would jump out at me as, this would be a better setup for my home, (front ported would be easier to arrange). I will be getting one of them.
Anyway I was wondering if other owners could tell me if they listened to the 40's and 60's and had an initial impression like I did but after listening for extended periods they decided to go for the 60's .
I only have a Technics 950 AV Receiver , which will be upgraded at a later date.
Sorry for rambling.
Thanks
Bob
I found both sets really nice, but what surprised me was they sounded a lot different from each other. Now I have read that they have the same speaker setup in both , and the major difference was the size of the speaker themselves. I expected to hear a bit more base from the 60's but basically the same sound. This was not so.
The dealer was selling the 60's for $1079 Cdn and the 40's were approx $880 with another $200 for the premier stands, so they would cost the same.
I do not have a sub, so I fully expected to get the 60's before I went in and the added base delivered by the 60's would do until a year or so until I could afford the purchase of a sub.
After listening for only 1/2 hour I kind of thought the 40's were more open sounding. Now I am unsure what to do as I don't know if this is only on certain music. I would use the system about 60/40 for HT/Music.
I am 200 miles from the dealer so I could not take them home and do an in home demo, also it is not a trip I make every month.
I will be going back in 2 weeks with some of my own music, but I was kind of hoping the 60's would jump out at me as, this would be a better setup for my home, (front ported would be easier to arrange). I will be getting one of them.
Anyway I was wondering if other owners could tell me if they listened to the 40's and 60's and had an initial impression like I did but after listening for extended periods they decided to go for the 60's .
I only have a Technics 950 AV Receiver , which will be upgraded at a later date.
Sorry for rambling.
Thanks
Bob