Reviews seem to indicate that the Blu-ray isn't the best sourced from a 35mm print and uses DNR excessively. Which version do you guys think is the best?
http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film/DVDCompare2/stranger5.htmRob Kilbride said:Reviews seem to indicate that the Blu-ray isn't the best sourced from a 35mm print and uses DNR excessively. Which version do you guys think is the best?
Good choice, the same issue came up with other titles like The Strange Love of Martha Ivers.Originally Posted by Rob Kilbride /t/323996/orson-welless-the-stranger-which-is-better-the-mgm-dvd-or-the-film-chest-blu-ray#post_3979889
Thanks for the input everyone. I swore I'd never buy a DVD while a Blu-ray was available but the quality seems close enough where DVD Beaver prefers the MGM DVD over the Blu-ray. I got the DVD for $3 at Big Lots but haven't opened it yet. $12 shipped isn't a lot for a Blu-ray but $9 difference is a lot to pay for something that is either worse or not much of an improvement. Also, did MGM have better sources than a 35mm print?
It's the best video presentation of this film I've seen and I bought it back in 2007, when it was a lot more than $3. It was much improved over the Roan release from 1999.Originally Posted by Rob Kilbride /t/323996/orson-welless-the-stranger-which-is-better-the-mgm-dvd-or-the-film-chest-blu-ray#post_3980023
Any other thoughts before I open the MGM disk? It seems like the DVD probably is the way to go. Again does anyone know if MGM had access to negatives or anything better than 35mm prints?