MickeS
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2000
- Messages
- 5,058
After I found out in a thread in the TV forum that Comcast in Philadelphia has started to transmit some channels in HD, I wrote and asked them about when/if they'll do it here. They basically replied that they were gonna wait and see what happens, and that the consumer base is too small right now.
One thing that interested me was this comment:
One thing that interested me was this comment:
Currently, there is not much high definition programming being offered by broadcasters, as well as little activity on the part of consumers for this programming. Less than 200 of 1,300 broadcast stations have begun digital broadcasting, and no more than 3,000 consumers have purchased the expensive equipment that must be used to capture the signal for HDTV.
Are these figures correct? I was very surprised to say the least, especially since Best Buy is selling the RCA 38" HDTV set w/ built-in receiver. I don't know how much that set sells, but together with the other set-top boxes out there, you'd think that there would at least be more than 3000 people/households nationwide that could receive HDTV signals (not to mention how many people there are that have the TV but not the receiver, and probably would be willing to get the receiver if the cable company carried the signal...).
Also, that only 200 out of 1300 stations are broadcasting isn't really an important figure, if those are the 200 biggest stations they reach a lot of people. And why they have to point out that the equipment will be expensive for me (I don't see it as that expensive), I don't know, but I can guess.
So, anyway, my question is: is the 3000 receivers figure accurate? I'm sure it was accurate at some point, but is it accurate now?
/Mike