Jeff Gatie
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2002
- Messages
- 6,531
If you aren't able to accept peer reviewed scientific studies or expert opinion, then you are hopelessly lost in buff land phil. I find it curiously ironic compared to your former complaints that conspiracy folks are "open minded" and it is us lone nutters who won't listen to reason. Pretty hard to take anything you say seriously when you so often do not practice what you preach. As to the fragments, it has been determined that when compared to the average weight of the bullets used, the 2.2 grains lost is well within the mean of bullets tested and is not excessive at all. This is in contrast to the buffs that make your claim, who only use the lowest possible bullet masses tested. See the following: http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/wound3.txt Also notice within the same link, it is a scientific fact that the fragments in Connally are from CE 399, the fragments from JFK are directly linked to the bullets fired from the Carcano, and no other bullet fragments, from any other gun or bullet type, were found in JFK, Connally, or the limo By the way phil, I'd ask if you enjoy getting shot down on an almost daily basis, but with your obvious dedication to the buff religion, I doubt you even notice through the haze of denial.