Making sequels doesn't mean they can't be innovative and presses the boundaries of film technology.Which is why he's decided to devote the rest of his life to making sequels.
Making sequels doesn't mean they can't be innovative and presses the boundaries of film technology.Which is why he's decided to devote the rest of his life to making sequels.
Remember, though, that Avatar was rooted in ideas he's had since he was a teenager. It's deeply personal for him.
He has yet to make a true stinker and you know that you're always going to see something made with obsessive attention to detail and design.
Slow down there, hoss - I wasn't encouraging Cameron to keep "TL" on the shelf!
Just speculating why it might be viewed as more problematic than "Abyss" and why Cameron might be less enthusiastic about it.
"Censored"? Where did I encourage THAT?
Touché!PIRANHA II: THE SPAWNING, anyone? But I agree that, since then, he has not directed a stinker.
While true that The Abyss certainly helped feed his passion for underwater exploration, it was also a pretty bad experience for everyone involved, unlike Avatar, so I can see why it might not be on the top of his list of things to revisit.I'd argue that The Abyss falls into that category as well. Cameron has always been in love with the sea and with diving, and The Abyss ties into all of that in spades. Heck the first Avatar sequel is, by all accounts, going to be set largely underwater on Pandora. So the question is, why would he abandon something that at one time WAS experimenting with pushing the technology and working on something that he loves and is passionate about? It makes no sense to me, when with relatively little effort on his part Cameron could give his fans what they want. It's bizarre.
To be fair, that was his full feature film directing debut so I'm sure he wasn't in the position to deny the old proverb "beggars can't be choosers".PIRANHA II: THE SPAWNING, anyone? But I agree that, since then, he has not directed a stinker.
To be fair, that was his full feature film directing debut so I'm sure he wasn't in the position to deny the old proverb "beggars can't be choosers".
Yeah, probably...plus, he was actually a co-director. I bring up the title from time to time just to be a jerk.
I'd argue that The Abyss falls into that category as well. Cameron has always been in love with the sea and with diving, and The Abyss ties into all of that in spades. Heck the first Avatar sequel is, by all accounts, going to be set largely underwater on Pandora.
I mean, Kubrick's first film, Fear and Desire, is... not great. Everyone has to start somewhere!To be fair, that was his full feature film directing debut so I'm sure he wasn't in the position to deny the old proverb "beggars can't be choosers".
People ought to look at the director greats from prior years and their first films. Yikes! Directors like Spielberg and Tarantino are not the norm when it comes to making quality if not great films at the start of their careers.I mean, Kubrick's first film, Fear and Desire, is... not great. Everyone has to start somewhere!
People ought to look at the director greats from prior years and their first films. Yikes! Directors like Spielberg and Tarantino are not the norm when it comes to making quality if not great films at the start of their careers.
Or maybe start a thread about well-known directors early work, and our favorite of those films.Might be an interesting thread to look at various first films from legends!
Andy Su, father of Sooty?So last years its coming at end of the year, which has come and gone was just another James Cameron, full of True Lies. Nice trolling James Cameron. I ain't holding my breath for it up rise up from the dark Abyss and see the light of 4K on the surface.