Much of what I might say, has been said better. But that won't stop me
The casting is sublime; I felt that I entered the world Of Harry Potter, seeing the characters and not various actors portraying them.
Dan states perfectly my feelings about the greatest weakness:
The casting is sublime; I felt that I entered the world Of Harry Potter, seeing the characters and not various actors portraying them.
Dan states perfectly my feelings about the greatest weakness:
for the most part the movie plays out like a "best of" the novel. To an extent, this is no bad thing, but basically the movie serves to be a string of the key moments from the novel lacking in the good character and story development that came in between such sequences in the book.
I'll add that the primary story line seemed to be not presented strongly, due to the somewhat disconnected scenes.
As always, it suffers from the "doesn't live up to the book" syndrome. Most lacking is not a specific scene, though, but the charming whimsy from the books. For example, in the book the use of owls as the postal service was tremendously funny and clever. In the movie, it lacked some of the whimsy, for me. But if I'd not read the book first, this would not be a weakness.
Despite its few weaknesses, Harry Potter is thoroughly enjoyable film. I enjoyed it from start to finish, never wishing for it to end. I also look forward to watching this at home -- I wanted to watch it, stretched out on my catch, a bowl of ice cream in hand, and just luxuriate in the world of Harry Potter.
For closing, a prediction: Hermione will be the object of affection for many 11-14 yr olds, much like Princess Leia was for my generation