Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Blu-ray and UHD' started by Ken Koc, Aug 29, 2019.
I must have missed a memo but I thought this thread was actually about Gone with the Wind.
Right, enough sidetracking let's get back on topic.
Does anyone know who I can contact at Warner Bros. to ask about this.
GWTW & Ben-Hur ! Both Anniversaries this year and NO 4K UHD releases ? Just Oz ??
Another 'big' WB celebrating an Anniversary is THE WILD BUNCH. Would love having all three!
If there were newer perfections to be found in a 4K/UHD of GWTW, then I'd be all over that one, as well.
But, it is now known that GWTW, itself, would benefit from this format; and would actually reveal its seams and secrets. Please refer to Posts #66-68 and also Post #76, where Robert Harris explains its likely pitfalls.
Yes, it's hard to imagine that if one film from 1939 could benefit from the 4K/UHD treatment, then all films from the same year might follow. Here at HTF, I have learned that restoration, transfers and format changes are never a case of one size - or year - fits all. This also holds true for the restoration for large format films. Just because a restoration of "Lawrence of Arabia" or "My Fair Lady" was able to garner the miracles we celebrated and cherished, does not mean that the same approaches and formula would work on the remaining 70mm films. Or, if I may paraphrase RAH upon this topic, "Each films presents a different set of problems".
In the end, if a 4K/UHD of GWTW isn't going to lead to something better but, rather, something uglier then we must accept this. At the same time, though, I see little wrong in knowing that I have lived to witness GWTW at its actual peak on a Blu Ray disc. As it is, I'm amazed that we're even getting "The Wizard of Oz" on a 4K/UHD disc and, perhaps, "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington"; for I was certain that 1957 and "The Bridge on the River Kwai" had become the cut-off year for what the 4K/UHD format could provide.
On a final note, since you've also mentioned "Ben-Hur" I, too, would be eager to see what this Wyler-Surtees canvas might look like; but only if its a proper candidate for this format.
I'm going out on a limb to say that it is a far more proper candidate for this format than GTTW or any of the others suggested, as it is large format and in good shape if the HD masters are anything to go by. Rock-steady with great colour.
Seeing the work that WB performed, one might be led to believe that Ben-Hur might be in great shape. One would be wrong.
Should it be considered for a 4k release?
That shot of Tara is moving vertically, because that is one of the shots from 1954 that was reframed.
I wish people would actually read the preceding posts
Nowhere does it say that GWTW has problems.
There were some posts that stated that increased resolution of older films MIGHT reveal some issues. But we do not know that GWTW has these issues or that a properly prepared 4K would display any issues.
I think Robert Harris has already answered that earlier in the thread.
Very disappointed we did not see an 80th Anniversary 4K blu-ray of Gone With The Wind! Hope they are not waiting another 10 years for the 90th Anniversary.
They won't wait that long. They just want the 4K market to be larger than it is now.
A 4K release might come out around closer to the 85th Anniversary, since it looks like GWTW is sitting out for it's 80th this year.
With all due respect and to David's point, I'm not getting what dye transfer prints have to with a 4K remaster? Am I missing something? The blu-ray (and even the DVD) were not made from dye transfer prints, but were already made from the original negatives recombined in the ultra-resolution process. Haven't we already "taken away" the marriage between the movie and the original prints? Wasn't any similarity to dye transfer prints just digital mimicry anyway?
This seems to make more sense, to be honest.
Let me try this one last time.
None of this discussion has anything to do with dye transfer printing, original negatives, or 4k resolution, except for a single factor.
The film was produced, designed and photographed, to be reproduced in a certain way, with the knowledge that prints would accurately reproduce the film as conceived.
Under those specific constraints, the effects worked.
That concept, and the means by which the effects were created and photographed, presumed a final projected resolution of less than 2k.
In later original prints, c. 1961, some of the seams began to show.
In HD, they become obvious to the knowledgeable eye.
At 4k, they look amateurish.
Which is not what the filmmakers had in mind.
And these flaws are not correctible, without changing the film.
All good points. It will be interesting to see what the 4K Wizard Of Oz looks like, as I'm assuming all the issues of seams and joints apply to this production too.
Best not to make assumptions.
Two very different films.
Not sure why WB would deem the market big enough for "Oz" and not "Wind"...
That raises the question whether anything shot on 35mm prior to the digital era should be viewed in 4K, as filmmakers were surely aware that prints and projection would limit detail to well below that level.