1. Sign-up to become a member, and most of the ads you see will disappear. It only takes 30 seconds to sign up, so join the discussion today!
    Dismiss Notice

No 4K release for Gone With The Wind's 80th Anniversary?

Discussion in 'Blu-ray and UHD' started by Ken Koc, Aug 29, 2019.

Tags:
  1. MatthewA

    MatthewA Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2000
    Messages:
    8,659
    Likes Received:
    2,294
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Salinas, CA
    Real Name:
    Matthew
    I must have missed a memo but I thought this thread was actually about Gone with the Wind.
     
  2. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    45,003
    Likes Received:
    20,548
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    Right, enough sidetracking let's get back on topic.
     
  3. GWTWTOO

    GWTWTOO Extra

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2008
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    11
    Real Name:
    Mark
    Does anyone know who I can contact at Warner Bros. to ask about this.
     
    Ken Koc likes this.
  4. RICK BOND

    RICK BOND Second Unit

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2017
    Messages:
    398
    Likes Received:
    472
    Trophy Points:
    110
    Real Name:
    RICK
    GWTW & Ben-Hur ! Both Anniversaries this year and NO 4K UHD releases ? Just Oz ??
     
  5. Paul Rossen

    Paul Rossen Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2004
    Messages:
    970
    Likes Received:
    435
    Trophy Points:
    610


    Another 'big' WB celebrating an Anniversary is THE WILD BUNCH. Would love having all three!
     
    Ken Koc and PMF like this.
  6. Message #106 of 183 Oct 1, 2019
    Last edited: Oct 1, 2019
    PMF

    PMF Producer

    Joined:
    May 6, 2015
    Messages:
    4,118
    Likes Received:
    4,545
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Real Name:
    Philip
    If there were newer perfections to be found in a 4K/UHD of GWTW, then I'd be all over that one, as well.
    But, it is now known that GWTW, itself, would benefit from this format; and would actually reveal its seams and secrets. Please refer to Posts #66-68 and also Post #76, where Robert Harris explains its likely pitfalls.

    Yes, it's hard to imagine that if one film from 1939 could benefit from the 4K/UHD treatment, then all films from the same year might follow. Here at HTF, I have learned that restoration, transfers and format changes are never a case of one size - or year - fits all. This also holds true for the restoration for large format films. Just because a restoration of "Lawrence of Arabia" or "My Fair Lady" was able to garner the miracles we celebrated and cherished, does not mean that the same approaches and formula would work on the remaining 70mm films. Or, if I may paraphrase RAH upon this topic, "Each films presents a different set of problems".

    In the end, if a 4K/UHD of GWTW isn't going to lead to something better but, rather, something uglier then we must accept this. At the same time, though, I see little wrong in knowing that I have lived to witness GWTW at its actual peak on a Blu Ray disc. As it is, I'm amazed that we're even getting "The Wizard of Oz" on a 4K/UHD disc and, perhaps, "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington"; for I was certain that 1957 and "The Bridge on the River Kwai" had become the cut-off year for what the 4K/UHD format could provide.

    On a final note, since you've also mentioned "Ben-Hur" I, too, would be eager to see what this Wyler-Surtees canvas might look like; but only if its a proper candidate for this format.
     
    Stephen_J_H likes this.
  7. Stephen_J_H

    Stephen_J_H All Things Film Junkie

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2003
    Messages:
    6,220
    Likes Received:
    1,445
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    North of the 49th
    Real Name:
    Stephen J. Hill
    I'm going out on a limb to say that it is a far more proper candidate for this format than GTTW or any of the others suggested, as it is large format and in good shape if the HD masters are anything to go by. Rock-steady with great colour.
     
    PMF likes this.
  8. Message #108 of 183 Oct 1, 2019
    Last edited: Oct 1, 2019
    Robert Harris

    Robert Harris Archivist
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 1999
    Messages:
    12,486
    Likes Received:
    15,328
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Robert Harris
    Seeing the work that WB performed, one might be led to believe that Ben-Hur might be in great shape. One would be wrong.

    Should it be considered for a 4k release?

    Yes.
     
  9. moviebuff75

    moviebuff75 Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2009
    Messages:
    823
    Likes Received:
    440
    Trophy Points:
    610
    Location:
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Real Name:
    Eric Scott Richard
    That shot of Tara is moving vertically, because that is one of the shots from 1954 that was reframed.
     
  10. David Weicker

    David Weicker Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Messages:
    3,347
    Likes Received:
    1,732
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Real Name:
    David
    I wish people would actually read the preceding posts

    Nowhere does it say that GWTW has problems.

    There were some posts that stated that increased resolution of older films MIGHT reveal some issues. But we do not know that GWTW has these issues or that a properly prepared 4K would display any issues.
     
    Nick*Z and Will Krupp like this.
  11. Worth

    Worth Producer

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2009
    Messages:
    3,264
    Likes Received:
    2,300
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Real Name:
    Nick Dobbs
    I think Robert Harris has already answered that earlier in the thread.
    https://www.hometheaterforum.com/community/posts/4777692/
    https://www.hometheaterforum.com/community/posts/4777495/
     
    PMF likes this.
  12. Dave Moritz

    Dave Moritz Lead Actor
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2001
    Messages:
    7,724
    Likes Received:
    1,618
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    California
    Real Name:
    Dave Moritz
    Very disappointed we did not see an 80th Anniversary 4K blu-ray of Gone With The Wind! Hope they are not waiting another 10 years for the 90th Anniversary.
     
  13. MatthewA

    MatthewA Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2000
    Messages:
    8,659
    Likes Received:
    2,294
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Salinas, CA
    Real Name:
    Matthew
    They won't wait that long. They just want the 4K market to be larger than it is now.
     
  14. darkrock17

    darkrock17 Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    1,523
    Likes Received:
    643
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Location:
    Alexandria, VA
    Real Name:
    Andrew McClure
    A 4K release might come out around closer to the 85th Anniversary, since it looks like GWTW is sitting out for it's 80th this year.
     
  15. Message #115 of 183 Oct 1, 2019
    Last edited: Oct 1, 2019
    Will Krupp

    Will Krupp Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2003
    Messages:
    2,571
    Likes Received:
    3,570
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Location:
    PA
    Real Name:
    Will
    With all due respect and to David's point, I'm not getting what dye transfer prints have to with a 4K remaster? Am I missing something? The blu-ray (and even the DVD) were not made from dye transfer prints, but were already made from the original negatives recombined in the ultra-resolution process. Haven't we already "taken away" the marriage between the movie and the original prints? Wasn't any similarity to dye transfer prints just digital mimicry anyway?

    This seems to make more sense, to be honest.
     
  16. Robert Harris

    Robert Harris Archivist
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 1999
    Messages:
    12,486
    Likes Received:
    15,328
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Robert Harris
    Let me try this one last time.

    None of this discussion has anything to do with dye transfer printing, original negatives, or 4k resolution, except for a single factor.

    The film was produced, designed and photographed, to be reproduced in a certain way, with the knowledge that prints would accurately reproduce the film as conceived.

    Under those specific constraints, the effects worked.

    That concept, and the means by which the effects were created and photographed, presumed a final projected resolution of less than 2k.

    In later original prints, c. 1961, some of the seams began to show.

    In HD, they become obvious to the knowledgeable eye.

    At 4k, they look amateurish.

    Which is not what the filmmakers had in mind.

    And these flaws are not correctible, without changing the film.
     
  17. titch

    titch Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2012
    Messages:
    623
    Likes Received:
    644
    Trophy Points:
    610
    Real Name:
    Kevin Oppegaard
    All good points. It will be interesting to see what the 4K Wizard Of Oz looks like, as I'm assuming all the issues of seams and joints apply to this production too.
     
  18. Message #118 of 183 Oct 2, 2019
    Last edited: Oct 2, 2019
    Robert Harris

    Robert Harris Archivist
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 1999
    Messages:
    12,486
    Likes Received:
    15,328
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Robert Harris
    Best not to make assumptions.

    Two very different films.
     
    PMF likes this.
  19. Colin Jacobson

    Colin Jacobson Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2000
    Messages:
    9,207
    Likes Received:
    3,106
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Not sure why WB would deem the market big enough for "Oz" and not "Wind"...
     
  20. Message #120 of 183 Oct 2, 2019
    Last edited: Oct 2, 2019
    Worth

    Worth Producer

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2009
    Messages:
    3,264
    Likes Received:
    2,300
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Real Name:
    Nick Dobbs
    That raises the question whether anything shot on 35mm prior to the digital era should be viewed in 4K, as filmmakers were surely aware that prints and projection would limit detail to well below that level.
     

Share This Page