MattAlbie60
I Work for Mr. E. H. Harriman of the Union Pacific
It looks, from memory, more or less exactly like this:
It's the same coverart as the recent UK rerelease.
It's the same coverart as the recent UK rerelease.
I'm not going to argue the merits of the different mixes. What I will say that is for those of us that have seen the film dozens of times in the original mono mix, the 5.1 mix can become quite distracting due to the fact that it's so different than what we grew up with. It's kind of like all those remixes of the early ZZ Top albums that we're done in the late 80s. On a technical level, they're superior, but after hearing "La Grange" hundreds of times on the radio prior to that, it just isn't the same when the drums have an 80s sound to them on a record that was made in 1973.Douglas Monce said:The original mono mix for The Terminator was done very fast on the cheap with stock gun sound effect heard in a thousand TV shows. It was crap in 1984 and its crap now. Even the sound of the laser guns were a modified generic "laser gun" sound effect that you could buy from a sound effects library.
I'm not saying the 5.1 mix is good, just that pining for the mono mix, is kind of like hoping they bring back World War 2 K rations. I suppose the mono mix does have value as a lesson in what NOT to do.
Doug
Special Features: said:**Terminator: A Retrospective
The original mono soundtrack would be the ticket.MattAlbie60 said:That's the ticket!