The Obsolete Man
Senior HTF Member
What night does this premiere next week? I want to be ready.
Thanks.
23rd, so next Thursday.
What night does this premiere next week? I want to be ready.
Thanks.
23rd, so next Thursday.
The original idea was that a young Picard had been called to a hospital where Uhura had a mission for him, and it was related to the Borg.
I’m not going to give any more away, because maybe one day we’ll actually do it!
There's one thing, I don't guess it needs to be explained and can be assumed, but they keep talking about the Picard Ancestral Home... the one that burned in Generations. So I guess he rebuilt it?
Every single Star Trek series in history has been accused of "viewing current event social issues through a sci-fi lens" and "heavy-handed proselytizing." This is nothing new, and I wouldn't expect Picard to back down on this. Indeed, this was one of the very reasons Gene Roddenberry wanted to produce the original series back in the '60s -- to bring urgent social issues to TV audiences in disguised SF-form that he couldn't do as (then-) "present-day" storytelling, due to network unease. Same thing with Rod Serling and his creation of The Twilight Zone, too.I was really looking forward to this, but the recent Variety interview with Patrick Stewart has me concerned. He said one of the themes will be a response to the current 'refugee crisis' going on, particularly in the U.S. I know that viewing current event social issues through a sci-fi lens is nothing new for Star Trek, but after watching the decline of 'Supergirl' due to heavy-handed proselytizing, I would hate to see the same thing happen here.
"Picard" wont fall into the "Supergirl" trap of preaching, and lecturing. Star Trek has always taken the social issues of the current climate of the world and handled them delicately. Unbiased, and fair.The problem with "Supergirl" isn't the allegorical themes, it's the overbearing execution of those themes where the show stops in its tracks to give the audience a lecture.
I have faith in Chabon et al to integrate their allegory organically into the story and deliver the political statements with some degree of subtlety.
Increasingly, streaming shows are shot in the 2:1 (or even 2.39:1) aspect ratio -- even though the vast majority of televisions and smartphone screens are 16x9.Letterboxing?
What exactly are you talking about
I’m excited for the show but will wait until after the season to subscribe and binge them all in one month. Just not enough on CBS AA for me to keep a subscription long term.
One rant though. I’m tired of TV shows using the 2.35:1 aspect ratio. I got no problems with letterboxing, been buying movies in letterbox since the VHS days. It makes since for movies shot in various ratios for large movie theater screens.
These TV shows though, are shot for the home where 95% of the audience has 16:9 screens. Adding black bars doesn’t make your show more dramatic or artistic. Discovery has done this as well and it has also annoyed me. I’m sure some think it makes it feel more theatrical but, many movies are shot in close to 16:9 ratios and still feel theatrical. If theses shows were getting theatrical runs then fine, shoot wide. Otherwise, why not use all the screen real estate you have available? I don’t know, maybe I’m odd for think like this but, it just bugs me.
Oh, I know, some of you are going to say “artistic choice”, which is fine. I just disagree with that choice when most of your audience has a fixed ratio.