Well, I do so we just disagree here. In my opinion, it's about time they show some personal growth in these super hero films.I understand the reasoning. I'm saying that I didn't care for that aspect of the film.
Mark
Well, I do so we just disagree here. In my opinion, it's about time they show some personal growth in these super hero films.I understand the reasoning. I'm saying that I didn't care for that aspect of the film.
Mark
I forgot that Ganke/Ned connection but yeah, I assumed he was Ned Leeds (at least in name).
I haven't read a Spider-Man book in over a decade. Who is Ganke?I forgot that Ganke/Ned connection but yeah, I assumed he was Ned Leeds (at least in name).
I sure don't know the ins and outs of Sony's Spider-Man deal but I was wondering if it was an issue of not having the rights to the characters created for the Ultimate universe since I think the movie deal dates back to before the Ultimate U was even created.If they didn't even use the name Leeds, then I'm better with it. I just wish they'd called him Ganke, but maybe they were afraid people would think they were totally replacing Miles with Peter (which is kind of a weird reversal).
He's the best friend of Miles Morales (Spider-Man from the old Ultimate universe).I haven't read a Spider-Man book in over a decade. Who is Ganke?
I really liked hearing Karen's voice. Nice job by Jennifer Connelly.Saw this at a matinee yesterday, expected a lot more people in the theater than there were. It was ok. I'd give it 3.0 out of 5. I agree with Mark Booth, I didn't care for Peter's immaturity. It was quite annoying. Didn't like that his suit had a mind of it's own. I think "Karen" had more speaking lines than Michael Keaton. I thought the acting was sub par especially with the high school kids. Still like Andrew Garfield better and Toby McGuire better. For me, the brightest spot of this movie was Michael Keaton. Also, save your money on the 3D, it wasn't very good.
Yeah, I didn't mention that earlier but I couldn't be happier that they didn't waste half the movie on an origin story.It's interesting because Marvel avoided doing the Spidey origin again since the vast majority of the audience has already seen that (spider bite and Ben's death), twice. Though this movie is absolutely still an origin story, but it's an aspect of his origin that has been glossed over previously. Definitely a good choice.
Haven't seen the film yet, but read about the "suit" in a couple places and I'm not sure I like this development (as compared to past films; I'm not sure what's been done in the comics).Didn't like that his suit had a mind of it's own. I think "Karen" had more speaking lines than Michael Keaton.
Does this Spidey actually have any superpowers, or is he just another guy in a suit with gadgets like Batman or Ironman?
'Spider-Man: Homecoming' was a good time at the movies. We'll probably show it in the Booth Bijou Garage Theater. But it could have been even better if we got what the title implies. Namely, Spider-MAN. Instead, it is about Spider-Boy. And although I knew that going in, I didn't know that Spider-Boy would be a bit of bumbling fool.
I didn't care for a Batman that could be so easily outwitted as he was in 'Batman vs. Superman' and I'm not particularly fond of a learn-as-you-go Spider-Boy. I don't suffer super hero fools gladly. I'll take my super heroes with more self confidence, thank you. It's one thing to make mistakes, quite another to be a bumbler.
Once I accepted that situation for what it was, I was able to mostly enjoy the film. The Booth Bijou gives 'Spider-Man: Homecoming' 4 out of 5 stars.
Also....Spider-Man really needs his spidey sense back. Seriously, what moron decided to take that away?
Edit: I'll answer my own spoiler question...Maybe they took his spidey sense away because, with it, Spider-Man can't be as much of a bumbling fool?!
Mark
I initially didn't like that the suit augmented his powers but in the context of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, it does make sense. Stark Industries built his Spidey suit so it only stands to reason that it would be in the vein of the Iron Man suits and have all kinds of useful gadgets.In the film, it's clear that he has superpowers. While the suit may give him some advanced weaponry and other gadgets, he still has enhanced strength and agility, and his senses are stronger than a normal person's.
I would still give Spider-Man 2 a slight edge as the better movie, but Tom Holland is far and away the best Spider-Man. Pretty early on, I forgot I was watching an actor and just accepted that it was Peter Parker up there on the screen. That never happened withJust returned from seeing Homecoming and Marvel nailed the character. My new favorite Spider-Man movie.
I thought the casting was excellent from top to bottom. The only critique I had was that they've wasted Angourie Rice as Betty Brant when she would have made an absolutely perfect Gwen Stacy.The only negative some folks might have is some of the casting (with Flash being the main example) but honestly I didn't have a problem with it.
This is so true. Not only is Peter winningly sincere, but he never loses sight of how cool it is to be Spider-Man -- even when it's real drudge work.Thankfully the sincerity and general charm of Spider-Man makes a welcome return for the first time since 2004's Spider-Man 2.
I kind of think that that was a nod to Rock 'n' Roll High School.If they were going to use the Ramones, I'd have rather they went with their great take on the Spider-Man cartoon theme but Blitzkrieg Bop worked too.
I wouldn't call him a bumbling fool, as I think a certain learning curve is only natural. It's worth remembering that Toomes and his crew had eight years to refine their operation between the Battle of New York and this movie. It makes sense that they'd be more on their game than a teenager who's still pretty new to all of this.And although I knew that going in, I didn't know that Spider-Boy would be a bit of bumbling fool.
I didn't care for this aspect either. Having Tony Stark make Peter's suit brilliant; it provides an explanation for something the previous five movies carefully ignored: How a young guy from Queens could make something that cost professional costume designers tens of thousands of dollars to make. But making the suit essentially an Iron Man armor without the armor robs Spider-Man of some of the underdog qualities that propel that character.Didn't like that his suit had a mind of it's own. I think "Karen" had more speaking lines than Michael Keaton.
He was excellent. There's a certain weight that comes from having one of the most iconic big screen superheroes playing a villain, the equivalent to having Sean Connery show up in a Daniel Craig Bond picture as the Big Bad. But it also helped that he wasn't a complete monster. His motivations were fleshed out well, and his ambitions (and crimes) were fairly constrained. Toomes isn't a guy looking to take over the world. He's a guy who became convinced that the game was rigged against him, and so he decided to break the rules to level the playing field, pay his mortgage and send his daughter to college. As far as I can recall, he only actually killed one person, and while he wasn't super broken up about it, there were indications that that had not been his intention at the time.For me, the brightest spot of this movie was Michael Keaton.
I totally failed to make that connection. Nice callback to the early days of Marvel's heroes onscreen, with the Ang Lee Hulk film.Nice job by Jennifer Connelly.
I thought that was great. Manhattan featured somewhat prominently, since the Avengers tower takes the place of the Pan Am (now MetLife) building in the MCU version of New York City, but it was nice that the bulk of the New York City scenes were set in Queens. It always bugged me that the previous Spider-Man movies centered so heavily around the touristy landmarks.And another departure from previous films is keeping him in the outer boroughs rather than functioning as a big time hero amidst the skyscrapers of Manhattan.
I loved it too. I really dug the inclusion of the theme from the 1967 cartoon early on in the score. It's the first MCU score that's really stood out to me since Christophe Beck's work on Ant-Man.And I thought the score was great. I walked out with two very distinct and memorable themes that I'm still humming. Both the Peter/Spider-Man theme and the Vulture theme were nicely done.
Absolutely perfect beat to end on. I just wish they'd used one of their two permitted PG-13 fucks rather than cutting it off mid-word.Great final line of the movie too! Laughed out loud with that one.
This was the movie's greatest strength. One of the movie's writers, John Francis Daley, played the male lead on "Freaks and Geeks", maybe the best show ever made about high school. So he had a front row seat to learn from the best.I liked that it was essentially a high school movie, and that Spider-Man's trials were not unlike those of a high schooler.
One of the best decisions was to make them all part of the same crew. Keaton's Vulture was unquestionably THE villain, while the rest were just components of that same threat.Two Shockers, The Tinkerer, The Prowler The Scorpion. Holy cow and none of it seemed crammed in.
I've been wracking my brain trying to think whether Liz's last name was ever actually spoken allowed. I was caught by surprise too, because I just assumed she was Liz Allan. If she was specifically identified by that name, it's a bit of a cheat that she'd have a different last name than her custodial father. If she wasn't specifically identified by that name, and my knowledge of Spider-Man just filled in the blanks, than it's an effective twist.A few people including me were very surprised when Adrian Toomes daughter was revealed. I never expected it.
It wasn't until they cast younger women to play Aunt May that I realized that that makes more sense than having Aunt May be about 100 years old like in the silver age comics.Regarding Marisa Tomei's age. Peter is 15 in this film, she's going to be 53 years old later this year. She looks good for her age, but the age is about right for an aunt to a teenager. Matter of fact, her age might be more correct than in previous Spider-Man films.
It played in front of my showing. I thought the audience reacted well to it.Forgive this tangent but did the Dark Tower trailer play in front of this? This is the primo opportunity for Sony to promote the film and I pray they are taking advantage of it. If it did, how did audiences react? Thanks.