What's new

Need "expert" 1803/PR opinions (1 Viewer)

JimPeitersen

Second Unit
Joined
Dec 7, 2001
Messages
470
Guys,
I have been playing with Winsid Pro, and have a few questions about PR's for an BP 1803 box. Perhaps I am misreading the graph, but I don't see were the Styke 18" PR's run into trouble in any reasonable box size (even when I model using only one of them.) Am I missing something? I would like to get some of the 18's that are on preorder, but I am not sure which model and alignment would work the best. Power is not a problem, and I have a BFD. Thanks in advance.
JP
 

Chris Carswell

Supporting Actor
Joined
Mar 5, 2002
Messages
598
I'm not sure.....
The 18" Pr's have a xmax of 25mm (50mm p-p) with a Sd of 1200 cm^2 = vd of 6L. From what I gather the BP 1803 has a xmax of 25.9mm (51.8mm p-p) and a Sd of 1217 which if my math is correct = vd of 6.3L . With one I think you are cutting it a little close. I'd go with two JTBS :) .
 

JimPeitersen

Second Unit
Joined
Dec 7, 2001
Messages
470
Chris,
That is what I thought also, but John J. corrected the figures for the 18" models on another thread (and his site.) They have a 3" (75 mm p-p) xmax and can displace about 9 liters. I understand the need for excess excursion, but at what point does adding a second PR become unnecessary?
JP
 

Dustin B

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2001
Messages
3,126
Jack G will hopefully jump in soon. But the rule of thumb with PR enclosures is to have at least twice as much Vp as you do Vd. If the 18" PRs are actually 9L of Vp then a pair should be fine with a 6.3L Vd driver, but one would not be ideal.
 

Jack Gilvey

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 13, 1999
Messages
4,948
I don't post when "experts" are called for, but since my name was mentioned...


If the 18" PRs are actually 9L of Vp then a pair should be fine with a 6.3L Vd driver, but one would not be ideal.
Agreed. If the "newly discovered" 9L Vd is accurate, a pair should be fine. Even if the Vd of one was technically enough (it's not), the shaking caused by such a mass (2500-3000g Mms) on one side without another balancing it would be extreme.
 

JimPeitersen

Second Unit
Joined
Dec 7, 2001
Messages
470
I think it has been mentioned before, but it looks like a simple vented box would be the best choice for this driver. An LT would work also, given the excursion and power handling of the driver. Thanks for the opinions though.
Jack, what PR box do you like for this driver?
JP
 
A

Anthony_Gomez

I agree. If PRs are the route, then dual opposed is the ONLY way to go. This driver ported will use a large enough enclosure such that an 8" port will not be too long.
Take a look at Brian Ownens ported enclosure with the 1803.
http://bkolfo4.freeservers.com/photo.html
I would use the 1803 in a 360L enclosure @ 18hz.
 

Jack Gilvey

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 13, 1999
Messages
4,948
My conclusion with this driver was that a big vented box made more sense since it needed to be so big anyway...no real advantage to PR's since a nice wide port will fit. I liked 400 liters tuned to 18Hz with an 8"D port.
 

Dustin B

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2001
Messages
3,126
Ha, neither of you know what you are talking about :p) I'm the only real psuedo expert here ;) I say it should be 380L tuned to 18.5hz with an 8" port :alien:
 

JimPeitersen

Second Unit
Joined
Dec 7, 2001
Messages
470
You guys are letting this "expert" thing go to your heads. :D It is actually a fun driver to play around with though.
JP
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Forum statistics

Threads
357,039
Messages
5,129,397
Members
144,285
Latest member
Larsenv
Recent bookmarks
0
Top