Sergio Martorel
Second Unit
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2003
- Messages
- 283
what about the Amish, who would not touch anything that is modern?Meh. Nobody likes the Amish as well, dude.
what about the Amish, who would not touch anything that is modern?Meh. Nobody likes the Amish as well, dude.
Please everyone, contribute. This is a recommendations thread, not a discussion about my friends' tastes in films.I don´t think people here REALLY wants to contribute with people with that kind of tunnelvision. And the most alarming part is that you say "friendS", plural, as in more than one. Who are your friends, after all? Refugees from the fallout of the Cahiers Du Cinema magazine? Advocates of the failed Dogma 95 filmmaking style?
I'm not even sure I know what "2D" cgi IS.That would include digital matte paintings, digital composition and computer enhanced scenery if I'm not mistaken. This makes the selection a whole lot broader, since most modern movies use one or more of these.
As I understand, the restriction is now: No intrusive and/or obvious CGI.
What type of friends will David invent next? Mr & Mrs No-Rear-Speaker-Sound perhaps?
No need to invent those. They're called "Bose owners"
How about any movie made before 1990?After watching the behind the scenes stuff in "Anger Management" where they CG'd all those people in Yankee Stadium, I'd have to agree with the above. Well, maybe not the date, but almost every movie uses CG, even the ones you'd never expect. It's gotten so good that it's almost impossible to watch an entire movie and figure out if there AREN'T CG effects.
Definitely stick to old movies.
Who Framed Roger Rabbit - CGI environment in some small sequences.According to the making-of documentary and the commentary on the Vista Series disc, all the effects were acomplished using opticals and animation. If you don't believe that, check out some of Richard Williams' other work like The Thief and the Cobbler.
However, I think the 3 follow-up cartoons used computer imaging.