RichMurphy
Supporting Actor
Delighted to see that TCM is now showing the restored version of GRIMM. Anyone on the fence about buying the new Warner Archive Blu-Ray can check out TCM On Demand to see the stunning improvement.
There is a variety of ways to zoom out (crop) the picture on modern systems for those who are into that kind of thing but there is no way to regain what has been cut off so I am happy that Warner gave us the full width.After watching the Blue Ray several times in both modes "flat and Smile" I am wishing instead of offering the flat version that they had instead used a cinemascope print like would have been used in general release after the film completed it's road show run. The current picture is so wide, it is short on height and looks small on every screen I've tried it on. A cinemascope print was probably pan and scan rather than cutting off the actions on far right or left. I remember seeing the film in cinemascope as a kid and really enjoyed it. This is a kids movie and to get young people (preteens) to watch it..the picture should be a reasonable viewable size.
After watching the Blue Ray several times in both modes "flat and Smile" I am wishing instead of offering the flat version that they had instead used a cinemascope print like would have been used in general release after the film completed it's road show run. The current picture is so wide, it is short on height and looks small on every screen I've tried it on. A cinemascope print was probably pan and scan rather than cutting off the actions on far right or left. I remember seeing the film in cinemascope as a kid and really enjoyed it. This is a kids movie and to get young people (preteens) to watch it..the picture should be a reasonable viewable size.
You can see a bit of that in How the West was Won. But HtWwW was filmed more conventionally, shot wise, and doesn't have that "fish eye" presentation of Brothers Grimm, which looks to have been done with a locked down camera on it's widest zoom coupled with that type of lens system and the camera pushed into the scene as much as possible.I'm not an expert, but the join lines between the 3 panels seem far less noticable when the cameras remain still without panning left to right. The flaws in the seams would also become more noticable when/if the seams traveled from left to right as they would have to do in a pan&scan process.
Same camera, same fixed lens (they wasn't replaceable) on both films. A few shots on HTWWW however, were shot in Ultra Panavision 70mm at 2.76:1.You can see a bit of that in How the West was Won. But HtWwW was filmed more conventionally, shot wise, and doesn't have that "fish eye" presentation of Brothers Grimm, which looks to have been done with a locked down camera on it's widest zoom coupled with that type of lens system and the camera pushed into the scene as much as possible.
After watching the Blue Ray several times in both modes "flat and Smile" I am wishing instead of offering the flat version that they had instead used a cinemascope print like would have been used in general release after the film completed it's road show run. The current picture is so wide, it is short on height and looks small on every screen I've tried it on. A cinemascope print was probably pan and scan rather than cutting off the actions on far right or left. I remember seeing the film in cinemascope as a kid and really enjoyed it. This is a kids movie and to get young people (preteens) to watch it..the picture should be a reasonable viewable size.
Rather a misleading comparison above as this is what the differences between the 2 versions look like on a CinemaScope screen.
View attachment 148360
Notice the sudden loss of weight on the guard on the extreme left (most evedent on his legs) and on the man on the extreme right of the smilebox image.
From your post:Not misleading if you have a 16 x 9 TV or 16 x 9 screen.
After watching the Blue Ray several times in both modes "flat and Smile" I am wishing instead of offering the flat version that they had instead used a cinemascope print like would have been used in general release after the film completed it's road show run. The current picture is so wide, it is short on height and looks small on every screen I've tried it on. A cinemascope print was probably pan and scan rather than cutting off the actions on far right or left. I remember seeing the film in cinemascope as a kid and really enjoyed it. This is a kids movie and to get young people (preteens) to watch it..the picture should be a reasonable viewable size.
From your post:
"Cropped to Cinemascope"
You can't really crop to CinemaScope without a CinemaScope screen. No point in doing that.....
I don’t think this has the Smilebox version, correct? I bought HTWWW and it is a “Widescreen Version Transfer Tailered to Home Screens” version only. I wanted to have Smilebox, but I guess I need to look for that one.
There's only one version from WAC: it's a 2 disc set with a widescreen 2.89:1 AR and the Smilebox version on a separate disc.I don’t think this has the Smilebox version, correct? I bought HTWWW and it is a “Widescreen Version Transfer Tailered to Home Screens” version only. I wanted to have Smilebox, but I guess I need to look for that one.