1. Sign-up to become a member, and most of the ads you see will disappear. It only takes 30 seconds to sign up, so join the discussion today!
    Dismiss Notice

My 2 cents worth on "Brothers Grimm"

Discussion in 'Blu-ray and UHD' started by William Moore, Jul 28, 2018.

  1. William Moore

    William Moore Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2014
    Messages:
    105
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    10
    Real Name:
    William
    Hello all. I am a huge fan of this movie, first of all because I worked at a Cinerama theatre in Wichita, Kansas in 1962 and 1963 and was there for the premieres of both HTWWW and WWOTBG; and secondly, because this movie to me is highly entertaining, well-acted and directed and is, as they say, "one for the ages." Anyway, does anyone know that there is a group of supporters of this movie called "Friends of the Brothers Grimm?" Some time back they got a petition together, which as far as I know is still on line, getting signatures so that eventually the petition can be submitted to Warner Bros., requesting that "Grimm" be restored (a la HTWWW) and released on BluRay. I am hoping that perhaps David Strohmaier, Cinerama restoration guru, may already be working on this project, since WWOTBG is the only remaining Cinerama film which has not yet been restored. Also, my limited research has revealed that supposedly the only remaining print of this film is owned by a man in Australia; and a 65mm interpositive exists which contains all 3 panels somewhere, plus the negatives, according to some sources, are available and useable! If you haven't seen some of Mr. Strohmaier's Cinerama restorations on BluRay, check them out. He has worked many miracles in restoring these great Cinerama productions. So let's all keep talking about this and keep our fingers crossed that "The Wonderful World of the Brothers Grimm" will truly live again!
     
  2. RolandL

    RolandL Producer

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    4,609
    Likes Received:
    1,973
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Location:
    Cromwell, CT
    Real Name:
    Roland Lataille
    08/24/62
    [​IMG]

    08/24/62
    [​IMG]


    08/29/62
    [​IMG]


    10/01/62
    [​IMG]
     
  3. Matt Hough

    Matt Hough Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2006
    Messages:
    18,800
    Likes Received:
    7,622
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    Real Name:
    Matt Hough
    The film certainly has its fans on this forum (including me despite some of its lapses). I signed that petition it seems ages ago. Since Warners controls this movie and it has been made clear to us on many occasions that preparing it for Blu-ray release would be a time consuming and ruinously expensive process, many of us have given up hope of actually seeing it come to BD. Warners never went any farther than laserdisc with it not even granting it a DVD signifying possibly that it was not a big seller for them. (Contrarily, How the West Was Won kept getting released repeatedly from tape to laserdisc to DVD and finally Blu-ray, every time with a transfer superior to what had gone before.)

    So, keeping my fingers crossed that it might one day come to us even if only in streaming form, but not really expecting anything other than what I've already got (the laserdisc).
     
    Bernard McNair and Darby67 like this.
  4. Ed Lachmann

    Ed Lachmann Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2011
    Messages:
    1,106
    Likes Received:
    1,021
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Real Name:
    Edmund Lachmann
    Count me in for this title. Saw it back in '63 as a kid and LOVED it. I still have the gorgeous yellow hardcover program from that screening. The gentle touch of George Pal is always enchanting and something we could use a lot more of in today's world. So hope we will see it in HD someday soon.
     
    Interdimensional and Darby67 like this.
  5. Robert Harris

    Robert Harris Archivist
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 1999
    Messages:
    11,560
    Likes Received:
    11,802
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Robert Harris
    Major physical differences between the two film.

    How is a basically unfaded set of negatives, while Grimm is incomplete and water damaged.

    I’ve not budgeted, but think 1.5 - 1.8 million.
     
    Bernard McNair, Darby67 and B-ROLL like this.
  6. haineshisway

    haineshisway Producer

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    4,100
    Likes Received:
    4,139
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Real Name:
    Bruce
    Warners is not going to give this to Dave - why would anyone think such a thing? And yes, one panel (I forget which) is water damaged - who knows how severely, but if it's severe there's probably no way to save it. Then again, Warners has pulled rabbits out of hats before.
     
  7. OliverK

    OliverK Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2000
    Messages:
    3,578
    Likes Received:
    1,575
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    As you know most of us think that it might be better to have Grimm in decent HD quality so you would probably call it wishful thinking that Warner would let somebody else handle Grimm.

    If at some point they had even done a 2k scan of each panel they could give those files away and let somebody have a go with it - all assets would stay in house and people could finally see a version of the movie with decent resolution, even with the water damage.

    Or we can look at it positively and say that Warner is probably hoping for automated techniques to become available that will help with dealing with the panel with the water damage.

    With that being said I would love to finally be able to watch this one but I refuse to watch it in LD or DVD quality.
     
    Darby67 likes this.
  8. haineshisway

    haineshisway Producer

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    4,100
    Likes Received:
    4,139
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Real Name:
    Bruce
    Mr. Harris has quoted a price that he thinks it would cost. Warners will not be spending that kind of dough on a title that will sell a marginal number of copies.
     
    ahollis and Darby67 like this.
  9. Thomas T

    Thomas T Producer

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2001
    Messages:
    3,715
    Likes Received:
    2,473
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Maybe if we create a go fund me page and each contribute $10,000 apiece towards that million plus Grimm restoration, it would help. After all, fans of Wonderful World Of The Brothers Grimm would put money where their mouth is, wouldn't we. ;)
     
    Darby67 likes this.
  10. OliverK

    OliverK Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2000
    Messages:
    3,578
    Likes Received:
    1,575
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    If that meant releasing Grimm in another way than the Warner way it might be possible. With the Warner price tag unfortunately not.

    But most of us know that already and then from time to time threads like this one pop up and we go over all of it again :)
     
    Darby67, Jimbo64 and Thomas T like this.
  11. cinemiracle

    cinemiracle Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    May 1, 2015
    Messages:
    897
    Likes Received:
    346
    Trophy Points:
    610
    Real Name:
    Peter
    Well acted? The two male leads were woeful.
     
  12. DP 70

    DP 70 Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2011
    Messages:
    933
    Likes Received:
    357
    Trophy Points:
    610
    Real Name:
    Derek
    I have seen the only 3 panel print of this a few times at Bradford, and the Centre Panel has one of the best focus i have ever seen in a cinema.
    This would look fantastic on 4K UHD but shame about the state of the original neg.
     
    Darby67 and Interdimensional like this.
  13. RolandL

    RolandL Producer

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    4,609
    Likes Received:
    1,973
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Location:
    Cromwell, CT
    Real Name:
    Roland Lataille
    I think WB also has an Ultra Panavision print, but I don't know what the condition is.
     
    Darby67, Interdimensional and DP 70 like this.
  14. OliverK

    OliverK Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2000
    Messages:
    3,578
    Likes Received:
    1,575
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    If the 70mm print that I saw of HTWWW is anything to go by it would not matter that much as it would be very soft and worse than a decent 35mm print. It seems that cinerama never really found a way to bring its process to a single film strip in a quality that would compare favorably to even standard 35mm which can also be seen when looking at the first This is Cinerama release on Blu-ray that looked very disappointing.

    That being said I might still be tempted to buy if a Blu-ray was created from that print as it should still look better than the laserdisc version. Or maybe I really need to go to Bradford once to see the real thing...
     
    Darby67 and DP 70 like this.
  15. MarkantonyII

    MarkantonyII Extra

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2016
    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    11
    Real Name:
    Mark
    Mr Harris, do you know if the water damage assertion is definitive or is it just one of those things that's been banded about for years and no-one has properly examined it - was it stored independently or just unlucky?
     
  16. haineshisway

    haineshisway Producer

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    4,100
    Likes Received:
    4,139
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Real Name:
    Bruce
    I'm not Mr. Harris, but two people here have told you one of the panels is water damaged - we both know whereof we speak. We don't bandy about things :)
     
  17. MarkantonyII

    MarkantonyII Extra

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2016
    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    11
    Real Name:
    Mark
    Very true, I wasn't casting aspersions, but you did say "...who knows how severely..." which implies if not states that very little examination has taken place, and / or the results of which are not widely known, which leaves the answer wide open to interpretation.

    M
     
    Darby67 likes this.
  18. RolandL

    RolandL Producer

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    4,609
    Likes Received:
    1,973
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Location:
    Cromwell, CT
    Real Name:
    Roland Lataille
    A 3-panel print from a private collector was shown at the 60th anniversary in 2012 and it looked OK to me.
     
    Ed Lachmann, revgen and Darby67 like this.
  19. Dan_Shane

    Dan_Shane Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2008
    Messages:
    167
    Likes Received:
    154
    Trophy Points:
    110
    Real Name:
    Dan Shane
    Not in my opinion, especially considering Harvey's dual role.
     
    Ed Lachmann and Darby67 like this.
  20. Strohmaier

    Strohmaier Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2012
    Messages:
    156
    Likes Received:
    521
    Trophy Points:
    110
    Real Name:
    David Strohmaier
    The Grim truth about “Brothers Grimm”

    The ownership and copyright of both dramatic Cinerama titles “HTWWW” and “Brothers Grimm” is shared 50-50 between (formally MGM) now Warner Bros. and Cinerama Inc. As part of the major Cinerama revival efforts done starting in 2000 I have had first hand knowledge of the condition of all the Cinerama elements which include “Brothers Grimm” even though it has been vaulted at Warners. At that time I represented the 50% owner of the title, Gunther Jung, also of Cinerama Inc. and John Sittig, Director of Cinerama Inc. and myself along with Warner’s Dick May, now retired, did several photo chemical tests at Crest labs in 2002 of the water damaged sections and the availability and condition of the o-neg elements. I had received a copy thru Dick of the 1995 o-negative inspection reports where multiple problems such as this damage was listed. A little less than half of the rolls had notations of moderate to severe water damage due to a flood in one of the vaults years earlier. We did print up one small 300 foot section of a water damaged panel and found that the damage was mostly on the left edge, but other rolls could be on different sides. We also found there were a few rolls of missing o-negatives, but we never got around to checking on the YCM separation masters to see if they were complete or not. We had found earlier that the Cinerama travelogues did not all have complete sep. masters so perhaps Grimm has them complete?

    Assuming the sep masters are complete then yes a restoration could be accomplished on “Grimm” however just imagine the expense of 9 B&W film frame elements (Y-C-M x3) to create 1 Cinerama 3-panel frame on the screen. Then if there is any shrinkage problems of the Y-C-M elements (as in misregistration) you would have one huge budget problem or the most expensive restoration/scanning job ever to end up with digital elements such as we have done with the travelogues.

    On our Cinerama travelogue restorations we were fortunate to have the Library of Congress 3-panel deposit Eastmancolor faded prints available to scan our missing sections and then rebuild back the color, however as I understand it from my pals at LOC there is no 3-panel 6-perf IB prints of “Grimm” on deposit which could possibly fill in any missing and damaged areas. They only have the 35mm scope general release version.

    Is “Brothers Grimm” digitally restorable? I would say the answer is possibly but a very hesitant yes. However it should be understood that it might not look as pristine as “HTWWW”. FYI -the o-negs on “HTWWW” were in excellent condition when we started printing up the answer print at Crest labs back in 2001. Warner Brother’s digital transfer work was started in 2006 from this same element for the blue ray release in the fall of 2008. This neg did not need very much clean up or digital restoration work. Blending the 3-panels back together again was a major part of that work.

    The reason I say possibly yes is that after our “Windjammer” Cinemiracle experience - dealing with such severe damage, shrinkage, fading, dirt, chemical blotches, warpage, missing panels vinegar syndrome and even entire rolls missing, nothing can ever scare me again. “Windjammer” turned out better than we could ever have imagined.

    In a nutshell -this is how I would approach “Grimm” without a 1.5+ mil budget: For starters carefully scan the Bradford UK IB tech 3-panel Cinerama 6 perf. print as well as some IB Tech 6 perf. elements we have recently located in Sweden. Then add in what is still usable of the o-negs favoring them where possible. In areas that simply cannot be saved then go from the YCM seps. Perhaps as a last resort, for troubled areas, use the 65mm IP, an optical created from the 3-panels at Metrocolor labs in the 1960s, this apparently has no cropping on the sides. If that element is used then attempt some better panel blending tricks on the optical printer join areas.

    Then a very slow and difficult 3-panel blending operation, clean up, dust busting and flicker removal. Finally the blending (color and density etc.) of the various composite 3-panel source materials to facilitate in minimizing the “checkerboard” look of these different elements. Thus make it as close as possible to appear like it’s all from one basic source. A challenge for sure!
     

Share This Page