mp3 or wma?

Discussion in 'Archived Threads 2001-2004' started by Bobby T, May 2, 2002.

  1. Bobby T

    Bobby T Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2001
    Messages:
    583
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Which format has better sound quality?
     
  2. Rob Gillespie

    Rob Gillespie Producer

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 1998
    Messages:
    3,632
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If they're both working at their best - then neither, because they'll sound the same as the source material.

    However WMA can sound better at a lower bitrate.
     
  3. Larry Seno Jr.

    Larry Seno Jr. Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2002
    Messages:
    527
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's true, WMA is less lossy even at lower sample rates.
     
  4. Kimmo Jaskari

    Kimmo Jaskari Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2000
    Messages:
    1,528
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There is little reason today to go with really low bitrates, and WMA is a completely proprietary format supported by a fraction of the devices that support MP3.
    If you absolutely have to shoe-horn in small files in a small memory space then maybe WMA is the choice, but if you want the best sound and greatest compatibility, you should be ripping your CD's with Exact Audio Copy and encoding the MP3-files with Lame. Both programs are free and absolutely top notch.
    See r3mix.net for lots of good info.
    There are other formats that beat either of them, on paper at least, but obviously not as broadly supported as MP3.
     
  5. Camp

    Camp Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 1999
    Messages:
    2,301
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I totally agree with Kimmo. The only reason to go with WMA is if you have serious space concerns. However, with HD prices as good as they are I can't see space being a real concern.
     
  6. Wayne Bundrick

    Wayne Bundrick Cinematographer

    Joined:
    May 17, 1999
    Messages:
    2,358
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I also agree. Unless you're dealing with a portable device with a tiny bit of RAM, go with high bitrate MP3.
     
  7. Bobby T

    Bobby T Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2001
    Messages:
    583
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Thanks everyone. Space and compatibility are not an issue. I'm currently doing 256 mp3s on a 40 gb drive in a computer connected to my main system. I use this as a jukebox for parties or working around the house. I just wanted to get the best possible quality out of the sound that I could.
     
  8. Rob Gillespie

    Rob Gillespie Producer

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 1998
    Messages:
    3,632
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Bobby - take a look at this site for getting the most out of MP3...
    www.r3mix.net
     
  9. Camp

    Camp Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 1999
    Messages:
    2,301
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Look into using VBR MP3s instead of 256kbps. You'll likely save space and get better sound (assuming you're using a good encoder)
     
  10. Kimmo Jaskari

    Kimmo Jaskari Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2000
    Messages:
    1,528
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That's pretty much what they say over at r3mix.net, vbr is the way to go. Based on the sound I myself get from VBR files, I would definitely agree; you save space but get great sound quality.
    In fact, might even be better (albeit undetectably so, since 256 CBR is already virtually impossible for almost everybody to separate from the original - yes, I like qualifiers [​IMG] ) since VBR's can go up to 320kbit momentarily if the encoder decides the music being encoded requires it.
     
  11. Justin Gates

    Justin Gates Agent

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2001
    Messages:
    47
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Or if hard drive space really isnt of concern, might I recommend a lossless compression format such as monkey's audio.
    www.monkeysaudio.com
     
  12. Ken Garrison

    Ken Garrison Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2002
    Messages:
    543
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think the WMA format SUCKS! MP3 encoded with LAME has a lot better quality than WMA.
     
  13. NickSo

    NickSo Producer

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2000
    Messages:
    4,260
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Real Name:
    Nick So
    Or check out the new format MP3PRO... People say that a 90kbps MP3Pro file sounds exactly the same as source!
     

Share This Page