I'm just a little annoyed. I just saw a news magazine on television extolling the benefits of placing million-dollar (each) fully automatic missile defence systems on the backs of commercial airplanes to protect them from missiles that may be launched by terrorists. This is the same crew that claimed that the Space Defence Innitiative was too costly and unreliable. IE - ground and space systems shooting down NUCLEAR warheads = bad : Strap one on to the ass of a 747 and shoot down stinger missiles = good. Anyone want to take a shot at explaining that logic? btw - the commercial jet one is laser as well.