1. Sign-up to become a member, and most of the ads you see will disappear. It only takes 30 seconds to sign up, so join the discussion today!
    Dismiss Notice

Misleading Photos in Home Theater Mag?

Discussion in 'Beginners, General Questions' started by Pete Little, Jan 17, 2004.

  1. Pete Little

    Pete Little Auditioning

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2003
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Theater Magazine features a widescreen TV face-off this month. In every single photo of the sets in action, the image shown on screen is from a movie that was shot in the 2.35:1 aspect ratio. (X2, Charlie's
    Angels Full Throttle)

    And yet each set shows the image filling the entire screen, no black bars at all, as though the films were shot in 1:85. How are they accomplishing this? There is no zoom mode that I am aware of that will display a 2.35:1 picture on a 16:9 set without small black bars.

    Is this just photoshop trickery on their part? Or is there something else I don't know?
     
  2. Wayne A. Pflughaupt

    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 1999
    Messages:
    6,222
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Corpus Christi, TX
    Real Name:
    Wayne
    Are you talking about the pictures at the beginning of each TV's review? You can take what's on the screen there with a grain of salt - I'd be very suprised if it wasn't superimposed.

    Regards,
    Wayne A. Pflughaupt
     
  3. Pete Little

    Pete Little Auditioning

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2003
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It tells the potential widescreen TV buyer that 2.35:1 material can be zoomed to fill his/her 16:9 set. If this cannot be done, it is tantamount to false advertising, no?
     
  4. Cees Alons

    Cees Alons Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 1997
    Messages:
    19,474
    Likes Received:
    340
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Cees Alons
    If it's part of a review, that wouldn't be false advertising (the article is not 'by' the manufacturer). But it could be a bit misleading.

    And yes, it's most probably done by Photoshop or another program like that. It's very hard to make a good photo of a TV-set with an on-screen picture.

    Cees
     
  5. SteveW

    SteveW Agent

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2003
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's done in Best Buy and Circuit City ads all the time. Just looks better for advertising to have a full picture on the screen.
     
  6. Chu Gai

    Chu Gai Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2001
    Messages:
    7,270
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes, and Playboy and Penthouse models don't look as good in real life...but they still look pretty damned good!
     
  7. Jack Briggs

    Jack Briggs Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 1999
    Messages:
    16,738
    Likes Received:
    129
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Much ado about nothing here. As Cees notes, images superimposed on pictures of TV screens are the norm as it's very difficult to take a picture of a TV set that renders a good image of what's onscreen as well as of the TV set itself.

    In the Sunday-morning circulars, this is just marketing. In magazine reviews, it's just "art direction."

    No biggie, and no "statement" regarding theatrical aspect ratios is being made.
     

Share This Page