There were four issues. You can see the covers on this page: http://www.3dfilmarchive.com/home/images-from-the-archive/comic-books/comic-book-cover-galleryDick said:Bob, how many issues of that magazine were published? I assume it only lasted a year or so -- I'd never heard of it before.
Ejanss said:It's LITERALLY reached the point of myth, and the reality's a bit short--The myth started back in the post-Avatar days when it seemed like there were no US studios playing with pop-out, so we wanted some "underdog" movie to come out of nowhere and show them "how to do it".
Five years later, Dreamworks builds all their movies around throwing as much at us as possible, and folks still say "Where can I buy this mysterious industry-changing Turtle movie?" It's true, we could still use more pop-out, but at least we now we're all a little older and wiser and have more of a domestic source for it.
And also for five years, we've been telling the Faithful--who want to prove they're faithful by going out and paying $20 of import charges on top of the disk price--that they can find the 3D version for rent on Vudu and Playstation Network, for $6-7 each.
And after you see it....you'll know why I recommended the rental sources.
You and i are in complete agreement on this.bruceames said:To my eyes, it lives up to that myth. It has the best 3D I've seen yet. Which later movie(s) do you think have better use of 3D? I'd like to see them.
Happy 4th of July, American chums!Bob Furmanek said:
Not lots of popout but since it is 3D i would welcome some, when you work on these films do you alter any of the 3D for the home, by that i mean optimize for certain displays, i ask because i have a DLP projector and don't suffer from crosstalk issues and i would hate to think these films get downgraded for LCD displays.Bob Furmanek said:My friend Peter Apruzzese has seen an advance copy of DRAGONFLY and said that he will post his observations in the next few days.
The Allied Artists studio-built 3-D rig had a fixed interaxial. The DP was Harry Neumann who had done a fabulous job on THE MAZE. If you've seen that in 3-D, you know that it has a VERY deep 3-D image and DRAGONFLY is the same. Most likely shot with 50mm lenses, it's very natural and is not gimmicky. If you're looking for lots of "popout" this is not the film for you. With that said, there are some excellent shots which take very good advantage of multi-layering and I feel the 3-D ads a lot to the film.
So far as the Paul Morrissey film, I spoke with him about restoring it last year. It's not well photographed and would need a great deal of work to minimize eyestrain. We could do it but it would be a big job and very time consuming.
Unless somebody is willing to work for free, I don't think it will get done...
We fix any baked-in vertical mis-alignment as that will cause eyestrain but we never alter the parallax. To do so would change the compositional intent of the director and DP. If they wanted an object at the stereo window, that's where it remains.FoxyMulder said:Not lots of popout but since it is 3D i would welcome some, when you work on these films do you alter any of the 3D for the home, by that i mean optimize for certain displays, i ask because i have a DLP projector and don't suffer from crosstalk issues and i would hate to think these films get downgraded for LCD displays.