What's new

"Mama's Family" ratings on i Network boad well for DVD releases! (1 Viewer)

David Rain

Screenwriter
Joined
May 7, 2005
Messages
1,165
Real Name
Dave
It ultimately doesn't matter to me who did what or how many idiots worked on the project. These episodes were released in unacceptable versions when the originals could have been obtained. There had to have been numerous people and/or companies who could have made sure the right thing was done. No one did and so all of those people are to blame. Yet again, the fans are the most informed and also the ones who get the shaft and the lies from the big companies who think customer opinions don't matter.

How about if fans start taking their edited sets and dumping them in front of the headquarters of these companies ? I think that's a nice visual.
 

Allison

Auditioning
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
12
I'm more upset about the fact that the 1982 movie Eunice wasn't even included in this set. I have it on tape and transferred over to DVD -- but my copy is 25 years old (they filmed Eunice in 1981) and in very poor shape, because my copy is from the original airing in '82. They couldn't even include the PILOT to the series... sigh...
 

MatthewA

BANNED
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2000
Messages
9,727
Location
Salinas, CA
Real Name
Matthew
Allison,

Warner apparently doesn't consider it part of the series because it never aired in the syndication package as three episodes, as it would have.
 

MatthewA

BANNED
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2000
Messages
9,727
Location
Salinas, CA
Real Name
Matthew
This thread seems to have died down (people must have used up their outrage on The Little Mermaid and Grease, which are badly remixed but not missing footage), but all I can say at this point is:

Keep those letters and phone calls up. It's the only chance of changing this unacceptable situation for the better.
 

Gord Lacey

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2001
Messages
2,449

How will the situation change? If they don't own the rights as they say, then they can't do anything about it.

Gord
 

Jason_V

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 7, 2001
Messages
8,983
Location
Orlando, FL
Real Name
Jason

What I think MatthewA is referring to is WB perhaps obtaining the rights for a complete S1 and/or a complete S2. Of course, I could be terribly wrong.
 

MatthewA

BANNED
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2000
Messages
9,727
Location
Salinas, CA
Real Name
Matthew
Gord,

I appreciate you going out to find the answers, but I suspect that they may of course be covering their asses. They could have acquired the rights at any time. They just didn't feel like it.
 

David Rain

Screenwriter
Joined
May 7, 2005
Messages
1,165
Real Name
Dave
Ok, I'm not sure I believe it but let's assume that they didn't have the rights to the unedited eps. How about not releasing a series until you DO have the rights ? And I've never heard of a series where the original versions were owned by one company and the syndies owned by another. Hello !

Perhaps our only hope is that they will make sure Season 2 isn't butchered.
 

MatthewA

BANNED
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2000
Messages
9,727
Location
Salinas, CA
Real Name
Matthew
Or they could just slap a "syndicated versions" notice in 4 point print on the back. After, Lion's Gate got away with it on "ALF."

Season 1 is defective, and like any defective disc it must be fixed. To not screw up further releases is a start. Warner must recall, repress, and repent, otherwise we have failed.
 

Steve Phillips

Screenwriter
Joined
Jan 18, 2002
Messages
1,521
It should have a sticker that fully discloses that the episodes are edited by several minutes each. Also, the "complete first season" should be removed, because it is in no way complete.

"Syndicated Episodes" doesn't automatically translate to edited to the average person. Lions Gate took the easy way out on the "Alf" packaging.

Warner can say they don't own the rights to the full shows all they want, but the fact is they still released edited product and didn't disclose it. If they knew they didn't get the uncut masters, I say they shouldn't have bothered to release the set in the first place.

It kind of sucks that so many people refer to this EDITED, TRUNCATED junk as "syndicated versions" instead of just calling it what it is. No one would accept a movie with 20% of the footage removed on DVD, so why people accept it with a shrug with TV on DVD is beyond me.
 

MatthewA

BANNED
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2000
Messages
9,727
Location
Salinas, CA
Real Name
Matthew
They accept it because they do not know that it is, in fact, cut. Why should they know when it is S.O.P. to cut all shows for syndication, with the uncut versions only available to archives and those smart enough to tape it in the original run (or, in the case of filmed shows, nab an uncut 16mm print from the collector's market)? It doesn't just kind of suck, it is a sick injustice.

And people still buy the first seasons of any Carsey-Werner show getting cut versions, even though all other seasons are unedited. They have yet to be fixed, and the company releasing "Cosby Show" and "A Different World" is in the process of being sold.

The very least Warner Bros. can do is make unedited episodes available to those who request it, as an act of good faith.

If Warner really doesn't own the uncut versions someone*else could, theoretically, license them for release.
 

Jason_V

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 7, 2001
Messages
8,983
Location
Orlando, FL
Real Name
Jason
MatthewA, you know I've agreed with you this entire thread...and I continue to do so. :) People don't know these episodes are cut and, as far as I've been able to discern, they do not care either. It's the same thing with pan and screen vs. widescreen. Effectively, the image is getting mauled in P/S when you can have the entire thing in widescreen. But people don't see that; all they see is a "small" image with black bars on their screen. (The term fullscreen doesn't help either, mind you.)

I am not promoting or trying to get hits or anything like that, but this ticked me off so much two weeks that that I had to use the things at my fingertips to enlighten some people. It was published two weeks ago and I think I hit everything we've been discussing.

I've got another one going live over the weekend about the regulatory board we discussed up thread.
 

MatthewA

BANNED
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2000
Messages
9,727
Location
Salinas, CA
Real Name
Matthew
Great article, Jason. I just worry that our plea may fall on deaf ears.

Of course, a tiny Canadian company can get another show from the same network and era right in regards to uncut episodes ("Gimme a Break"), but the largest entertainment conglomerate in the world can't?

Perhaps maybe one of the cast members will discover this and pitch a fit. Roseanne was livid when she found that season 1 of her show was cut on DVD.
 

Jason_V

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 7, 2001
Messages
8,983
Location
Orlando, FL
Real Name
Jason
Okay, now we're getting somewhere. While the agreement may preclude John Hamilton from releasing them, does it necessarily preclude Warner from giving him a ring saying "Hey, what would it take for us to get our hands on the original episodes?" I can't imagine John would want too much for two seasons of episodes, especially with the quick turnaround time he responded to the original e-mail. Sounds like a good guy...Warner, drop him a line!
 

Steve Phillips

Screenwriter
Joined
Jan 18, 2002
Messages
1,521
Warner is NOT off the hook for releasing edited product and labeling it complete.

If they don't own the rights to the uncut shows, and are either unwilling or unable to secure the rights to them, why not just forget the idea of a DVD set?

After all, they still sell the edited shows in syndication and can make money that way.

However, if they had clearly labeled the set as edited, shorter versions and removed the word complete from the title of the set, then at least they wouldn't be guilty of deceptive practices.
 

MatthewA

BANNED
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2000
Messages
9,727
Location
Salinas, CA
Real Name
Matthew

I agree 100% and stand by my statement that Warner could have made a deal for the DVDs with John Hamilton at any time.
 

JohnMor

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Messages
5,157
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Real Name
John Moreland

And John Hamilton could have made the deal for the uncut ones as well. That goes both ways. The rights owners are the ones really in charge, not the bidders. A studio can't force you to license them the inferior product.
 

MatthewA

BANNED
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2000
Messages
9,727
Location
Salinas, CA
Real Name
Matthew
Perhaps so.

Did they even try to negotiate a deal with John Hamilton? No. Did John Hamilton contact Warner Bros. saying he had the network-length copies? No.

Can they do it and offer replacements for those who ask for them? Yes, and if they expect me to patronize their products in the future, they should.
 

David Rain

Screenwriter
Joined
May 7, 2005
Messages
1,165
Real Name
Dave
Is John Hamilton on some type of medication ? He had to have known at some point that the show was being prepared for release. Did he bother contacting anyone to say he had the originals ? Did he care about the fans of the show at all ? Alienating devoted fans of your show is really great business practice, huh ?

Everyone involved in this project is to blame for this disaster. I suggest that all of us be prepared to blow Season Two out of the water as well since this may very well happen again.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
357,052
Messages
5,129,666
Members
144,281
Latest member
blitz
Recent bookmarks
0
Top