Tom Brennan
Screenwriter
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2000
- Messages
- 1,069
- Real Name
- (see above)
Ling---What, here I reach out a hand in reasonableness and you crack wise with me.
Ling, uh, I have heard new Maggies recently and they have the same faults they always did to me; poor bass, "mellowness" and poor dynamics.
How do you expect to talk about how speakers sound or compare WITHOUT talking taste? It's ALL personal perception and opinion.
And do ALL Maggies use this gee-whiz technology (well it was gee-whiz in 1930 anyway when ribbons and planar magnetics were new) or are not some built just as mine were; Saran-wrap with magnet wire glued to it opposite refrigerator magnets glued to a perforated sheet?
What's the matter with old Bose 901s anyway, I mean REALLY the matter, not just what audiophile fashion holds. Maggies have a similar presentation of sound to 901s. I think lots of Maggie owners would love 901s in a DBT.
Ling, uh, I have heard new Maggies recently and they have the same faults they always did to me; poor bass, "mellowness" and poor dynamics.
How do you expect to talk about how speakers sound or compare WITHOUT talking taste? It's ALL personal perception and opinion.
And do ALL Maggies use this gee-whiz technology (well it was gee-whiz in 1930 anyway when ribbons and planar magnetics were new) or are not some built just as mine were; Saran-wrap with magnet wire glued to it opposite refrigerator magnets glued to a perforated sheet?
What's the matter with old Bose 901s anyway, I mean REALLY the matter, not just what audiophile fashion holds. Maggies have a similar presentation of sound to 901s. I think lots of Maggie owners would love 901s in a DBT.