Lolita (1997)

Discussion in 'DVD' started by Rain, Apr 17, 2003.

  1. Rain

    Rain Producer

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2001
    Messages:
    5,015
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I just watched the Adrian Lyne's film of Lolita for the first time ever last night.

    First off, I cannot recommend this film highly enough.

    Though I'm likely to draw some flame for this, I have to tell you that in all honestly it is a far superior film to Kubrick's version. While Kubrick made a good film of the novel, Lyne made a great one.
    ______________________________________

    Anyway, what I am wondering is how the 2 DVDs of this film compare. I picked up the newer Lion's Gate Signature Series version and I guess I just want to make sure I picked the right one. Usually the newer version is of better quality, but it's not always the case.

    Has anyone seen both and compared the transfers?
     
  2. KimK

    KimK Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2001
    Messages:
    81
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's just a new cover, that's all.
     
  3. PaulP

    PaulP Producer

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2001
    Messages:
    3,291
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    As I have the first version, I was wondering this as well. So the content is identical?
     
  4. Randall Dorr

    Randall Dorr Second Unit

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2000
    Messages:
    267
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
     
  5. Rob Lutter

    Rob Lutter Producer

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2000
    Messages:
    4,523
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Kubrick liked to make stories HIS OWN. He took the IDEAS behind the book and made it into a totally different movie. I kind of liked how Kubrick blended humor (one of my favorite performances of Peter Sellers) and the main character's tragic end...
    without Lolita... killing the man that split them apart... and going to prison for it

    Kubrick's movie is AWESOME in my book (definately in my top 50 + top 10 B&W films)... but it shouldn't really be compared with the, uh... BOOK. [​IMG] I actually think of Lolita as Kubrick's bow to Hitchcock... it just FEELS like a Hitchcock film to me.

    Rain, I'll definately have to check out the newer version seeing as you liked it so much. [​IMG]
     
  6. Rain

    Rain Producer

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2001
    Messages:
    5,015
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Lyne's film is not without some terrific dark humour as well.

    I agree with Rob's point....Kubrick was usually less interested in following the source material to the letter than he was in making the adaptation into his own vision.

    However, I've never read the novel, so I am only comparing the two films...with no regard to which one is more faithful to the book.
     
  7. Richard Kim

    Richard Kim Producer

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2001
    Messages:
    4,385
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Count me in as one who prefers the Kubrick version over Lyne's. I thought that Shelley Winters perfectly captured the loneliness and irritability of Charlotte Haze, compared to Melanie Griffith, who paled in comparison.

     
  8. Rain

    Rain Producer

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2001
    Messages:
    5,015
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I thought Melanie Griffith was far more effective than Shelly Winters.

    Ditto for Irons vs. Mason and Swain vs. Lyon.

    The only thing to "miss" in the newer version of Lolita is Peter Sellars. And while his performance in the original film is fun, it's also a bit distracting.

    In Lyne's version, Frank Langella, despite having very limited screen time, makes the character of Quilty his own, delivering a terrific performance.

    To me, Lyne's film packs much more of an emotional wallop than Kubrick's.

    But to each their own. [​IMG]
     
  9. Eric Peterson

    Eric Peterson Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2001
    Messages:
    2,959
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I agree completely with Rain. In my opinion the Lyne version is much better than Kubrick's, but that is probably also due to the time in which it was made. Kubrick had his hands tied by the censorship of the early 60's. I did love Shelly Winter's performance in the original, however it went a bit over the top at times, which I found distracting. My SE of the Lyne version should show up in the mail today, and I can't wait to watch it again.
     

Share This Page