Lilo & Stitch - Widescreen OAR?

Discussion in 'Archived Threads 2001-2004' started by Chris M, Aug 30, 2002.

  1. Chris M

    Chris M Second Unit

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2000
    Messages:
    487
    Likes Received:
    0
    From www.thedigitalbits.com
     
  2. Damin J Toell

    Damin J Toell Producer

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2001
    Messages:
    3,762
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Real Name:
    Damin J. Toell
     
  3. rutger_s

    rutger_s Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2000
    Messages:
    878
    Likes Received:
    0
    Lilo and Stitch has an original intended AR of 1.66:1.

    The reason why its called "Family Friendly Widescreen" is because on 4:3, it fills most of the screen and on a widescreen TV, it pretty much fills the entire screen.

    The 1.66:1 frame is windowboxed inside a 1.78:1 window.
     
  4. Chris Dugger

    Chris Dugger Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 1998
    Messages:
    665
    Likes Received:
    1
    The film played in theatres at a ratio of 1.85:1.

    Dugger
     
  5. Tom M

    Tom M Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 1999
    Messages:
    223
    Likes Received:
    6
    I am a projectionist who is very familiar with Lilo And Stitch's AR. Earlier this summer and just this Thursday I had to splice together a print of this film.
    The image on the film is 1.85:1 hard matte. If the DVD is 1.66:1, then expect some minor panning and scanning. Of course, incorrect ARs have been listed before including on the actual packaging.
    I suggest not panicking untill we see what is on the actual disc. [​IMG]
     
  6. Jeffrey Gray

    Jeffrey Gray Second Unit

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2001
    Messages:
    488
    Likes Received:
    0
    The PRINTS were 1.85:1 hard-matte. The actual film is 1.66:1, since that's the AR of the films Disney has done with CAPS (save Atlantis).
     
  7. Patrick McCart

    Patrick McCart Lead Actor

    Joined:
    May 16, 2001
    Messages:
    7,555
    Likes Received:
    186
    Location:
    Georgia (the state)
    Real Name:
    Patrick McCart
    All of Disney's post Little Mermaid films, not in scope, were rendered at 1.66:1.

    The CAPS system is digital, so the entire image is done at 1.66:1. When it's put on film, it's hard-matted to 1.85:1 for theaters (to keep the composition from being off).

    A 1.66:1 version would have the entire existing image exposed, with no cropping outsie of STMPE framing.
     
  8. Chris M

    Chris M Second Unit

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2000
    Messages:
    487
    Likes Received:
    0
    So, why not just show the feature at 1.66:1 in the theater!

    They do still display shows at that ratio! (don't they?)

    Makes no sense to me.

    Chris.
     
  9. Peter Apruzzese

    Peter Apruzzese Producer

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 1999
    Messages:
    3,427
    Likes Received:
    968
    Real Name:
    Peter Apruzzese
     
  10. AaronMK

    AaronMK Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 1999
    Messages:
    768
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Real Name:
    Aaron Karp
     
  11. Patrick McCart

    Patrick McCart Lead Actor

    Joined:
    May 16, 2001
    Messages:
    7,555
    Likes Received:
    186
    Location:
    Georgia (the state)
    Real Name:
    Patrick McCart
     
  12. Justin Lane

    Justin Lane Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2000
    Messages:
    2,149
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  13. AaronMK

    AaronMK Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 1999
    Messages:
    768
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Real Name:
    Aaron Karp
    Anyone know what the "747" ending mentioned on The Digital Bits refers to?
     
  14. John Berggren

    John Berggren Producer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 1999
    Messages:
    3,238
    Likes Received:
    1
    1.66 is the proper AR for Lilo and Stitch, as with all modern Disney animated features which are not 2.35.
     
  15. Chris M

    Chris M Second Unit

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2000
    Messages:
    487
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, as far as I knew OAR was for Original THEATRICAL Aspect Ratio... which is 1.85:1 BUT I can make an exception if the animators created the film in 1.66:1 and the film was matted in the theater for 1.85:1 for the reasons stated above.

    It makes no sense for Disney to do that... but whatever.

    Chris.
     
  16. Joshua Clinard

    Joshua Clinard Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2000
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    69
    Location:
    Abilene, TX
    Real Name:
    Joshua Clinard
    There can only be one correct aspect ratio. If the correct AR is 1.66:1, then the one matted for theaters is incorrect, and therfore, we should not view it in the theaters. If the one made for theaters is correct, then the DVD transfers are incorrect.

    Movies are made for the THEATER! Therefore, in my opinion, the 1.85:1 AR is the correct one, and we should DEMAND that we get the real thing. Not this "Family Freindly" Widescreen. I do not beleive we are missing anything in the theaters. Has anyone done any screen comparisons to PROVE that the DVD transfers are not missing any info on the sides??
     
  17. Jean-Michel

    Jean-Michel Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    769
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  18. Adam Lenhardt

    Adam Lenhardt Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2001
    Messages:
    17,590
    Likes Received:
    2,104
    Location:
    Albany, NY
     
  19. Damin J Toell

    Damin J Toell Producer

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2001
    Messages:
    3,762
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Real Name:
    Damin J. Toell
    You should really do some research into the Disney animation process before you make such boldly incorrect assertions.
    DJ
     
  20. Patrick McCart

    Patrick McCart Lead Actor

    Joined:
    May 16, 2001
    Messages:
    7,555
    Likes Received:
    186
    Location:
    Georgia (the state)
    Real Name:
    Patrick McCart
     

Share This Page