I would say in this case the answer is economies of scale. While there are many TV manufacturers there are only maybe a couple of companies that build the actual display panels. The polarization technology required for 3D displays would necessitate a separate production line and these companies do not likely foresee a sufficient return on investment. Similar to my take on physical media, whatever the future brings, I'm going to keep enjoying the 3D content I already have on my 3D capable projector for as long as possible.It’s still a niche of a niche but considering how many other high end, low volume niches there are in high end video and audio setups, why not?
I agree with most of your comments. For me personally, my option to watch 3-D content is dwindling as having a projector setup isn't feasible for me. Therefore, once my 3-D displays are gone then I'm done watching 3-D content. TBH, I probably have watched only 2-3 of such titles in the last couple of years. My interest is more towards 4K content going forward.I would say in this case the answer is economies of scale. While there are many TV manufacturers there are only maybe a couple of companies that build the actual display panels. The polarization technology required for 3D displays would necessitate a separate production line and these companies do not likely foresee a sufficient return on investment. Similar to my take on physical media, whatever the future brings, I'm going to keep enjoying the 3D content I already have on my 3D capable projector for as long as possible.
I would say in this case the answer is economies of scale. While there are many TV manufacturers there are only maybe a couple of companies that build the actual display panels. The polarization technology required for 3D displays would necessitate a separate production line and these companies do not likely foresee a sufficient return on investment. Similar to my take on physical media, whatever the future brings, I'm going to keep enjoying the 3D content I already have on my 3D capable projector for as long as possible.
I use these with my 6050 so you should have no issues. They're readily available on eBay.John (and @Josh Steinberg), what do you use for 3D w/ your Epson PJs?
Maybe I'll finally get a pair of glasses to try it w/ my Epson 5050UB since people keep saying it works better than at typical theaters. But do I also need to get a separate transmitter for that though? Not sure... as I probably need to keep the cost low... Thanks!
_Man_
Oh I'm pretty much in the same range. I just don't like the idea of my options being taken away.I agree with most of your comments. For me personally, my option to watch 3-D content is dwindling as having a projector setup isn't feasible for me. Therefore, once my 3-D displays are gone then I'm done watching 3-D content. TBH, I probably have watched only 2-3 of such titles in the last couple of years. My interest is more towards 4K content going forward.
Most new 4K Laser UST projectors I have looked at all have 3D.Sadly even new projectors seem to be ditching 3D.
Most new 4K Laser UST projectors I have looked at all have 3D.
UST's seem to be a lot more favorable to 3D than standard 4K projectors it seems.LG HU810PW doesn't support 3D.
Epson's EH-LS11000 and EH-LS12000 (just released in Europe) don't either.
Just seems to be a worrying trend.
I love both of my Samsung 3D TVsI'll kick this over to hardware.
Perhaps LG will be introducing 3D in its high-end models.
Doesn't mean that the studios are going to revive the format as a result, but it would be nice to have it available again on a flat panel display.
That's why I'll only believe it when I actually see it back on any of their OLED sets.It’s all one guy saying it…