Carlo_M
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 1997
- Messages
- 13,413
I've always owned AVRs. From mass market Sony AVRs when I graduated college and couldn't afford anything over $500, to their ES line when I got a little more disposable income, an NAD T763 (which is my motivation to buying the Outlaw) and then to Pioneer Elites and my current Denons (4400 and 4500).
The NAD was a standout for some very good, and bad, reasons. First, the good. It had a toroidal power supply. I'm no engineer but I remember when I bought it, remarking at how it felt almost twice as heavy as the Sony ES AVR it was supplanting. Setting it up with my existing speakers, I was shocked at how much better the sound quality was. I wasn't running the speakers any louder (I've always lived in apartment complexes so I can't run reference levels) but even at reasonable volumes, I felt like I was hearing little nuances, and the speakers had an added level of clarity, which was missing with the Sonys. There was just...I don't know how to describe it...an effortless power to the NAD and it seemed like my speakers responded. The closest analogy I can come to it is maybe cars. Take a 100hp car and a 250hp car and go 65mph: yes the speed is the same, but the ride quality just feels different. And if you need to step on it to pass a tanker on the freeway, the 250hp car will instantly give you that power which the 100hp car won't.
And now for the bad: the NAD had a few issues which eventually made me move on from it, mostly related to its main processor. It was slow to pick up CODECs which resulted in missing the first split second of movies, music, etc. It also had a slight hiss I could never get rid of, but from listening positions wasn't too much of a problem. But also, when the newer 7 channel CODECs came out, I remember NAD was slower to pick up on them than others, which is why I went with the Elites, and then Denon for the Atmos, and have never ventured back into the land of toroidal supplies. I remember feeling like when I got the Elites (which had Class D amps) I didn't feel like I stepped down too far from the NAD, but even if I did, I was happy to be able to decode the new codecs. Same with Denon and Atmos, any degradation in sound I gladly ignored to get my Atmos systems running.
But after having lived with the Denons for a couple of years now, I started feeling like my HT sounded a little "flat". Not bad. Nothing wrong. For whatever reason, I randomly recalled how alive my speakers (which haven't changed after these many years, MB Quart QLS 1030s and 530 in the main HT which are 4 ohm speakers) felt when the NAD was driving them. Maybe it's looking back with rose colored glasses. But that's the beauty of the 30 day return policy, I will get to try it out for myself and decide.
I went with the Outlaw over the Monoprice Monolith 7X because, as I mentioned, living in a shared complex for the foreseeable future, I'll never be able to put the extra wattage of the Monolith to use. Plus I just don't want to own and have to deal with a 93 lbs piece of gear. The Outlaw at 61 lbs was already making me hesitant. Plus if separates aren't going to be the answer for me, my back is going to be much happier re-boxing a 30 lbs lighter piece of gear. Plus, if I love the Outlaw, with the price savings from the Monolith ($850) I'm 85% of the way to buying a second Outlaw for the bedroom.
It's supposed to arrive in a week or so, and I'll update this thread with unboxing pictures and impressions. I'm doing a deep dive into my 4K UHD, SACD, and DVD-A catalog until then, trying to get my brain used to how my current setup sounds. Yes I realize any comparisons will be unscientific, I'm not breaking out any measuring devices. I'll leave that up to Audioholics guys. While no one is immune to "New Toy Euphoria", I think with my years of buying, selling and trading home theater equipment, guitars and associated gear, I've gotten to the point where I can be honest with myself when I've made a purchase that didn't live up to expectations, or provide a noticeable improvement.
Oh I lied, I will break out one piece of equipment: my trusty Rat Shack SPL meter. I don't use any of the fancy EQ adjustments of the Denons (or any other previous AVR I've owned). But I do use their test tones to make sure each of the channel levels are the same at my prime listening position. I'll do the same basic level adjustment once the Outlaw is intalled. I'll also use the SPL meter to ensure I'm listening to material at approximately the same volume after the Outlaw installation, so that I'm not falling prey to the "Louder is Better" phenomenon.
The NAD was a standout for some very good, and bad, reasons. First, the good. It had a toroidal power supply. I'm no engineer but I remember when I bought it, remarking at how it felt almost twice as heavy as the Sony ES AVR it was supplanting. Setting it up with my existing speakers, I was shocked at how much better the sound quality was. I wasn't running the speakers any louder (I've always lived in apartment complexes so I can't run reference levels) but even at reasonable volumes, I felt like I was hearing little nuances, and the speakers had an added level of clarity, which was missing with the Sonys. There was just...I don't know how to describe it...an effortless power to the NAD and it seemed like my speakers responded. The closest analogy I can come to it is maybe cars. Take a 100hp car and a 250hp car and go 65mph: yes the speed is the same, but the ride quality just feels different. And if you need to step on it to pass a tanker on the freeway, the 250hp car will instantly give you that power which the 100hp car won't.
And now for the bad: the NAD had a few issues which eventually made me move on from it, mostly related to its main processor. It was slow to pick up CODECs which resulted in missing the first split second of movies, music, etc. It also had a slight hiss I could never get rid of, but from listening positions wasn't too much of a problem. But also, when the newer 7 channel CODECs came out, I remember NAD was slower to pick up on them than others, which is why I went with the Elites, and then Denon for the Atmos, and have never ventured back into the land of toroidal supplies. I remember feeling like when I got the Elites (which had Class D amps) I didn't feel like I stepped down too far from the NAD, but even if I did, I was happy to be able to decode the new codecs. Same with Denon and Atmos, any degradation in sound I gladly ignored to get my Atmos systems running.
But after having lived with the Denons for a couple of years now, I started feeling like my HT sounded a little "flat". Not bad. Nothing wrong. For whatever reason, I randomly recalled how alive my speakers (which haven't changed after these many years, MB Quart QLS 1030s and 530 in the main HT which are 4 ohm speakers) felt when the NAD was driving them. Maybe it's looking back with rose colored glasses. But that's the beauty of the 30 day return policy, I will get to try it out for myself and decide.
I went with the Outlaw over the Monoprice Monolith 7X because, as I mentioned, living in a shared complex for the foreseeable future, I'll never be able to put the extra wattage of the Monolith to use. Plus I just don't want to own and have to deal with a 93 lbs piece of gear. The Outlaw at 61 lbs was already making me hesitant. Plus if separates aren't going to be the answer for me, my back is going to be much happier re-boxing a 30 lbs lighter piece of gear. Plus, if I love the Outlaw, with the price savings from the Monolith ($850) I'm 85% of the way to buying a second Outlaw for the bedroom.
It's supposed to arrive in a week or so, and I'll update this thread with unboxing pictures and impressions. I'm doing a deep dive into my 4K UHD, SACD, and DVD-A catalog until then, trying to get my brain used to how my current setup sounds. Yes I realize any comparisons will be unscientific, I'm not breaking out any measuring devices. I'll leave that up to Audioholics guys. While no one is immune to "New Toy Euphoria", I think with my years of buying, selling and trading home theater equipment, guitars and associated gear, I've gotten to the point where I can be honest with myself when I've made a purchase that didn't live up to expectations, or provide a noticeable improvement.
Oh I lied, I will break out one piece of equipment: my trusty Rat Shack SPL meter. I don't use any of the fancy EQ adjustments of the Denons (or any other previous AVR I've owned). But I do use their test tones to make sure each of the channel levels are the same at my prime listening position. I'll do the same basic level adjustment once the Outlaw is intalled. I'll also use the SPL meter to ensure I'm listening to material at approximately the same volume after the Outlaw installation, so that I'm not falling prey to the "Louder is Better" phenomenon.