1. Sign-up to become a member, and most of the ads you see will disappear. It only takes 30 seconds to sign up, so join the discussion today!
    Dismiss Notice

Is there optimal size HDTV for viewing 13' away?

Discussion in 'Archived Threads 2001-2004' started by Drew_E, Aug 3, 2002.

  1. Drew_E

    Drew_E Agent

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2002
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    simply, if i were to get an HDTV would there be a good choice to settle on for viewing at a distance of 13 feet? i think i can cram in something well over 60" in there but is there any generally accepted forumla for distance-to-resolution?
     
  2. Thik Nongyow

    Thik Nongyow Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2002
    Messages:
    189
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Drew, I think you need to change your topic header. Some people would think thirteen feet, instead of thirteen inches.
     
  3. Josh Lowe

    Josh Lowe Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2002
    Messages:
    1,063
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    i would think at 13 feet you could get a 65" or bigger. I am 7 feet from a 53" and it works quite well. the old standards of seating distance vs. screen size were for lower quality/resolution images than what newer TVs provide.
     
  4. Drew_E

    Drew_E Agent

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2002
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Thik - yes thirteen feet, not thirteen inches, is what i am communicating in the header. I was under the impression that ' denotes feet and " denotes inches in this society, and that it was well accepted.

    Josh - thanks. i'm probably going with 57" because it fits both in the designated area and in my budget.
     
  5. Steve Schaffer

    Steve Schaffer Producer

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 1999
    Messages:
    3,756
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    My eyes are exactly 13 feet back from my 57" 16/9 Sony. If all my viewing were dvd or HD, I could go as big as 65 or even 73 inches, but cable and regular satellite stuff would be a bit too grainy on that big a screen.
     
  6. Drew Eckhardt

    Drew Eckhardt Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    May 10, 2001
    Messages:
    246
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    To visually resolve 1080i you must sit within 3.3 screen heights. That means 47" high, 84" wide, and 94" diagonally on a 16:9 set.

    For cinematic impact, I'd go a bit bigger (maybe 92" wide/102" diagonal).

    Personally I run a 72" wide 16:9 screen at 10', but am switching to 87" wide at 12' once I get done remodeling.
     
  7. jeff lam

    jeff lam Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2001
    Messages:
    1,798
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    San Jose, CA
    Real Name:
    Jeff Lam
  8. Drew_E

    Drew_E Agent

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2002
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
     
  9. Drew_E

    Drew_E Agent

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2002
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    oh hey.. after reading that link i realize that maybe you guys aren't catchin my main drift. it isn't about the viewing angle but rather the resolution. that calculator doesn't take into account resolution and i was just curious as to what might look grainy. i assume 57" would be fine, but i was just asking because i saw a huge 72" wide screen and the seats were too close, and it didn't look too attractive.
     

Share This Page