Is there a good way to watch 1.66:1 non-anamorphic in WS?

Jeff Swearingen

Second Unit
Joined
May 23, 2003
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Points
110
Location
Windermere, FL
Real Name
Jeff
I have a 16x9 set and have been trying to figure out a good way to watch my 1.66:1 AR movies without window boxing completely or losing a chunk of the top and bottom in a zoom mode. Is there a preferred way that anyone has found?
 

Andrew Bunk

Screenwriter
Joined
Nov 2, 2001
Messages
1,825
Reaction score
0
Points
0
I think it probably depends on the brand of TV you have. Unfortunately my Toshiba doesn't have a zoom that handles 1.66:1 well. I used to have a DVD player that actually zoomed out a little. Maybe using a zoom out on a player in conjunction with the proportinal zoom meant for non-anamorphic 1.85:1 could do it.

Or studios could just release all their 1.66:1 material in anamorphic.
 

Gordon McMurphy

Producer
Joined
Aug 3, 2002
Messages
3,530
Reaction score
1
Points
0
If you have a 14:9 mode, use it and then set the overscan slightly higher than it is at present.
 

Scott Merryfield

Executive Producer
Joined
Dec 16, 1998
Messages
15,723
Reaction score
3,396
Points
9,110
Location
Michigan
A few DVD players offer variable zoom/scaling that would allow you to properly size the picture. Unfortunately, my Panasonic RP-91 has a single, fixed scaling/zoom size that works fine for 1.85:1 and wider aspect ratios, but crops 1.66:1.

I hate 1.66:1 non-anamorphic titles!
 

Rolando

Screenwriter
Joined
Feb 19, 2001
Messages
1,335
Reaction score
5
Points
110
Have to agree, love my Malata N996 for that. variable zoom or even better set TV to FULL then use the X,Y scaling to "un-squeeze" to right proportions.
 

DaViD Boulet

Lead Actor
Joined
Feb 24, 1999
Messages
8,801
Reaction score
7
Points
5,110
This is one reason I will not purchase a 4x3 encoded 1.66:1 transfer from any main-line studio (who should know better...and that includes the folks at WB and MGM).

Besides the problematic framing issue when "zooming" on your typical 16x9 set or DVD player, there is no reason why we should have to watch an image that has so needlessly sacrificed the increase in resolution that 16x9 encoding would have provided (I think about a 25% increase for 1.66:1 titles).

-dave
 

Jeff Swearingen

Second Unit
Joined
May 23, 2003
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Points
110
Location
Windermere, FL
Real Name
Jeff
I'm now on my fifth player in a six month period (Pioneer DV-563A-s) and I just can't justify switching again (especially after I've been upgrading display and cabling plus purchasing DVDs quite a bit all in the past two months)! Looks like I'll be researching HTPCs for possible future purchase but until then this is going to drive me nuts.

I have no idea how many 1.66:1 non-anamorphic titles I own right now but I have a feeling when I catalog everything this summer I will be even more upset than I was after trying 2-3 of these titles this week.
 

Ted Todorov

Producer
Joined
Aug 17, 2000
Messages
3,469
Reaction score
213
Points
4,110


Yeah, same here -- every time I hear zooming complaints I just shrug. The Malata N996 is a treasure of a DVD player... The other great thing about it is that you can zoom out slightly to conteract TV overscan.

Ted
 

Aaron_H

Agent
Joined
Sep 11, 2003
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Real Name
Aaron
Hey guys,

I don't know if this is against the rules or not...where is a good place to look at buying a Malata N996?

Thanks!
 

Forum Sponsors

Forum statistics

Threads
343,763
Messages
4,689,138
Members
141,029
Latest member
injurylawyer3