Is the SR-71 still the fastest aircraft?

Scott L

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 29, 2000
Messages
4,457
I remember seeing one at an airshow (it was grounded) and the plaque next to it said they were first designed in the 60s


Despite their birthdate they still look amazing:

 

Jack Briggs

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 3, 1999
Messages
16,805
Yes, they do.

The SR-71 was first operational in 1964.

It holds the speed records for, at least, known aircraft. It's the "unknown aircraft" that might have displaced the SR-71's performance numbers. Specifically, the so-called "Aurora" aircraft: It's not a confirmed vehicle, but evidence suggests it exists. And the story in that the Aurora may in fact even be able to reach suborbital space.

Eventually, we will know. But, again, as far as confirmed aircraft are concerned, the SR-71 is at the top.
 

Jeff Gatie

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2002
Messages
6,531

Hey, I was designed in the 60's and I still look . . . well . . . not amazing, but pretty damn good if I may say so myself.
 

Bryan X

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2003
Messages
3,469
Real Name
Bryan
I saw one up close and personal in a hanger at Wright Patterson Air Force Base. Those things are just as incredible looking in person.

Here's one of the more interesting facts about this plane:

Due to the great temperature changes in flight, the fuselage panels did not fit perfectly on the ground and were essentially loose. Proper alignment was only achieved when the airframe warmed up due to the air resistance at high speeds, causing the airframe to expand several inches. Because of this, and the lack of a fuel sealing system that could handle the extreme temperatures, the aircraft would leak its JP-7 jet fuel onto the runway before it took off. The aircraft would quickly make a short sprint, meant to warm up the airframe, and was then air-to-air refueled before departing on its mission.

Cool video:
 

Bonnie*F

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Jan 28, 2005
Messages
226
Haven't seen a SR-17 but I did see an A-12 which is the forerunner at the USS Battleship Alabama Memorial Park right on Mobile Bay. According to the website SR-17 Online (www.sr-71.org), the A-12 was marginally faster than the SR-17. Both are beautiful pieces of machinery.
 

Joe D

Supporting Actor
Joined
May 21, 1999
Messages
838
There is a SR-71 at the Evergreen Aviation Museum in McMinnville Oregon where the Spruce Goose is located. I highly recommend going to see both.
 

Blu

Screenwriter
Joined
Oct 6, 2001
Messages
1,360
I believe there is also an SR-71 in Hutchinson Kansas at the Cosmosphere.
 

Dennis Nicholls

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 5, 1998
Messages
10,768
Location
Boise, ID
Real Name
Dennis
Actually the SR-71's design was started in the late 1950's, as Kelly Johnson knew that the U2 would soon be in range of Soviet SAMs.

When I went to work for Lockheed in 1979, I was somewhat awestruck in that I was joining an organization that had built an all-titanium Mach 2.5+ aircraft TWENTY YEARS earlier.


Beats me how Aurora is doing. Why don't you ask Jack?
 

Jay Taylor

Supporting Actor
Joined
Sep 8, 2000
Messages
836
Location
Oklahoma City
It wasn’t that long ago when the F-117A Nighthawk Stealth Fighter and the B-2 Spirit Stealth Bomber were classified aircraft. Mysterious night time sightings were reported as UFOs. Now they fly in broad daylight over the Super Bowl.

Will we eventually have Aurora (aka SR-91) flyovers at sporting events? Possibly, but I doubt it.

According to the Wikipedia some people believe that “the Aurora project was cancelled due to a shift from spyplanes to high-tech unmanned aerial vehicles and reconnaissance satellites which can do the same job as a spyplane”.

Wikipedia: Aurora


But even if the Aurora project was cancelled it may have set some speed records.

So now we get to read about sightings of triangular shaped aircraft near places like Area 51 and let our imagination run wild:

Aurora Project


To see the “Donuts-on-a-Rope” contrail video, click on the link under “Current Knowledge of Aurora”:

FirstScience.com - Aurora


"Donuts-on-a-Rope" contrail photos:

The Aurora Aircraft Page
 

ChristopherDAC

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2004
Messages
3,729
Real Name
AE5VI
I think I got kicked out of university for discussing… certain interesting possibilities… with the designer of the so-called "Aurora" vehicle. At least, that's the least paranoid explanation I can come up with. It's worth remembering that there was a fighter variant of the A-12. The A-12/SR-71 was a one-off, hand-built type of aircraft, but in the even there were more of them made than of the aircraft they were proposed as escorts for, the superb B-70 Valkyrie, which was designed for large-scale production. There never was a "production model" B-70 built, so the full Mach 3 cruise capability was never demonstrated, but the aircraft was something special. One of them would have been an ideal component of a developmental two-stage-to-orbit space transportation system (to make an obvious example, a Mercury-Redstone combination launched from a B-70 at 100 000 feet and Mach 3 could have made orbit). I think the YF-12 was actually equipped with antisatellite missiles at one time. That was my problem, by the way. I worked out that, if this "Aurora" thing exists (as I have reason to believe it does), it could be a component of a workable — or working — 2STO system. Then I tried to discuss it with someone who ought to know. Shortly after that, strange things began to happen to me. What happened wasn't so odd, given how academia operates, but how it happened was distinctly surreal.
 

alan halvorson

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 2, 1998
Messages
2,009

Are there any still flying? They have been retired from military use (so far as we know), but I knew a few examples were still being flown for research purposes. I'll bet these have been retired too.

After the SR-71, what is the next fastest plane? Can any other plane cruise at more than Mach 1? The F-22 and F-35, probably?

The Minnesota National Air Guard once held an open cockpit day at their museum where they had an A-12. No how, no way could I have ever flown in one of these things, even if the cockpit could have been arranged to fit me (they couldn't close the canopy on me and I didn't even have a helmut on). For as big as these aircraft are, they sure didn't allow much room for the pilot. Even though I am not claustrophobic, flying for hours confined within that tiny area would have driven me batty.
 

JohnRice

Bounded In a Nutshell
Supporter
Ambassador
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2000
Messages
13,684
Location
A Mile High
Real Name
John
As I recall, it was retired several (about 15) years ago and then brought back into service.
 

BrianW

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 30, 1999
Messages
2,563
Real Name
Brian
If the Aurora existed, which it doesn't, it doesn't have -- I mean it wouldn't have 2STO capability, particularly with regard to time-on-target, global reconnaissance missions, which we have no desire to do, so that's NOT what the Aurora is for. If it existed, that is.

Christopher, you'll be required to report to your supervisor's office first thing in the morning. You'll receive an envelope containing specific instructions to follow regarding your upcoming transfer to Alaska. If all goes well, you should be there by Christmas. Or else.

Oh, and if anybody is still wondering, the SR-71 IS the fastest bird ever flown. Ever.

Trust me.



(I've always wanted to do that.)
 

BrianW

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 30, 1999
Messages
2,563
Real Name
Brian
Wow, I just checked out some of the links you all provided. If the Aurora's (presumed) Pulse Wave Detonation Engine works the way it sounds like it works, it sounds like a bumpy ride. I wonder what the pulse frequency is? If we knew the height of the contrails, which would allow us to determine the distance between the "donuts", we could then calculate the pulse frequency of the engine as a function of the aircraft's speed. If the speed is sufficiently high enough, you wouldn't even be able to feel the thrust variations. Even better, knowing the distance between the contrail donuts, we could make a pretty good guess what the minimum speed would have to be in order for the aircraft not to tear itself apart as a result of the impulse nature of the engine's operation.

Hey, do you guys hear helicopters? Black helicopters?
 

Ashley Seymour

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jun 29, 2000
Messages
938
While stationed with the Air Force in Okinawa in 1970, the B-52’s were withdrawn. Nothing made as much noise taking off or landing as the eight engine bomber that was not concerned with sound abating technology.

After they left the only plane that made that same sound was the SR-71. It would take off almost vertically and the distinctive silhouette was spooky.


“Even though I am not claustrophobic, flying for hours confined within that tiny area would have driven me batty.”

Flying long hours was not an issue and not what the stress the pilots faced. Flying at 2,000 mph causes a different level of stress.
 

Chu Gai

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2001
Messages
7,270
Jack, you wouldn't be talking about those pulsed vapor trails that crossed the US now would you?
 

alan halvorson

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 2, 1998
Messages
2,009

If it could go this fast, the shuttle could go to the moon. Orbiting speed is between 17-18,000 mph. Escape velocity is something like 25,000 mph.
 

RobertR

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 19, 1998
Messages
10,665
Hmmm. Is the X-15 being left out of the discussion because it wasn't an air breather? The SR71 is an awesome machine I very much admire, but the X-15 flew MUCH faster and MUCH higher.
 

Forum Sponsors

Forum statistics

Threads
345,533
Messages
4,744,704
Members
141,475
Latest member
Macoco