It seems like more and more lately, their reviews have gotten so ridiculously biased and unobjective that it's impossible to compare scores from one game to the next. I think they've started a policy of adding a point to PS2 scores, subtracting 1 point from GC scores, and subtracting 1.5 points from Xbox scores. The story is the same almost every time: multiplatform game comes out, Xbox version looks the best, Xbox version is scored the same or lower than the PS2 version. On one sports game, they even had the audacity to write the same review for the PS2 and Xbox versions with a paragraph mentioning that the Xbox ver. looked the best, yet they scored the Xbox version lower. They also seem to be coming up with graphics scores on a whim. Anyone can see that Blinx looks quite a bit better than Mario, yet Mario got a significantly higher graphics score. Same story with TJ&E 3, they actually scored Ty the Tasmanian Tiger significantly higher in graphics. I really don't understand their system at all. Tony Hawk 3 - 10.0 GTA3- 9.X State of Emergency - 8.5 Mario Sunshine - 8.0 Toe Jam and Earl 3 - 5.0 Tony Hawk gets a perfect score, yet they say GTA3 is a better game deserving of GOTY, State of Emergency is better than Mario Sunshine, and TJ&E is absolute crap? Apparantly someone doesn't understand the concept of funk.