Drew Bethel
Screenwriter
- Joined
- Nov 22, 1999
- Messages
- 1,209
I'm hoping to hook up with this bird from Slovakia next month...I love her kinda broken english accent...amongst other things!
Are people w/ an English accent more educated than everyone else? Are they more affluent and powerful? Do they have better taste? Are they more sophisticated, and exert more influence? Are they the uppercrust of society?
Yes, yes they are.
To which our allies quipped: "(The trouble with) the Americans (is that they're) are overpaid, oversexed, and over here!"
To which the Yanks replied, "The trouble with the Brits is that they're underpaid, undersexed, and under Eisenhower."
Regards,
Joe
I have seen numerous occasions where "Fanny" is used as a proper first name for British ladies.
Well, there are also plenty of men in the world named "Dick" and "Johnson", which doesn't rule out the use of both names as slang for something else entirely. The one has nothing to do with the other.
Regards,
Joe
So even God speaks 18th century Elizabethan English before it even becomes a dialect of the spoken tongue.
Not to quibble, but I'm pretty sure Queen Elizabeth I predated the 18th century...
-Dave
Now the whole Elizabethan English thing is solved simply because people use the King James Bible
Except that Americans read the King James Bible (as they read Shakespeare) in an American accent, not a British one. It isn't as if it were written phonetically or something.
The popularity of the KJV might explain why Elizabethen rhythms and even volcabulary have survived into the 21st century, but it can't explain why Americans seem to go for an English accent. It isn't like people have been listening to the KJV on tape or CD for the past 200 or so years.
(And I'll go on record as saying that while some English accents can be quite charming, others are like fingernails on a blackboard to my ears - which can also be said of various French, Spanish and American ones. I've known a few people who speak with such accents, and they can be painful to listen to. But I could listen to Diana Rigg all day long - among other things.)
Regards,
Joe
But I could listen to Diana Rigg all day long - among other things.
I was under the assumption that American English had evolved, (mutated) from they way the English now speak which I thought had not changed appreciably for a couple of hundred years. It seems that English in the native land is evolving in a more sophisticated manner than in the North America.
The best evidence suggests that the major regional American accents are different because the areas were originally settled by people from different parts of England. Once mostly cut-off from the sound of the mother tongue, and the changes going on there, they evolved independently. But there have always been strong regional differences within languages, probably more so in the middle ages (when travel was more difficult and each village so isolated that it might have one visitor in a year.) There is a famous story of some London merchants being shipwrecked near a coastal village on the way to Scotland around the 12th or 13th century. They were unable to get directions or even food from the locals, who couldn't understand what they were saying, although both groups were theoretically speaking English. One of the villagers later explained the communication problem by saying, "I don't speak frainsh"
The increasing ease and security of travel after Europe emerged from the dark ages, the tendency of printing to standardize spelling, and at least help to standardize pronunciation and finally - in the 20th century - the advent of radio and television is doing much to break down regional pronounciations in most languages. American newsreaders tend to use the flatter midwestern accent, which is less jarring than a strong Boston or deep Texan accent to people throughout the country. The BBC tends to favor certain accents as well. As a result of sheer exposure we're all starting to sound more and more alike within each country, much as regional cuisine either becomes national or recedes, and architectural styles become more uniform as everyone reads the same magazines and sees the same examples on the tube.
So I don't think American English is developing any less than that in the U.K. (or elsewhere - we haven't even mentioned Australia - which come to think of it may be a good thing. ) It is just developing differently as it has tended to since the Founding.
(BTW, regarding odd survivals like "gotten" Why is "therefore" still in use while its opposite, "wherefore" has vanished? )
Regards,
Joe