I forgot to mention that I finally tested my region-free mod with Ratatouille and it worked fine.
This is my first Oppo and is by far the most responsive disc player I have ever had.
No 4K display? And I thought I was all alone, on that front.'Responsive" is a good word, Wayne. I'm with you. I got the 203 earlier this year as I wanted a single player for all my disc needs (including the high-rez audio needs) and I've been reading on these pages about how great the Oppo players are for so many years.
I don't even have a 4k display...yet. But I still LOVE this player.
Don't wonder how 4K will look. My LG 65UH8500 (might have model wrong-the 65 is the size) is fantastic. I have a samsung 56" (?) LED previously and the step up in quality if very significant. My blu rays look great, UHD discs are fantastic, the passive 3D is love, live tv looks great. If you can squeeze it into the budget, go OLED, that's even better.Honestly can't say that I have noticed any difference.
My display is a 55" Panasonic Plasma which just turned five last week. I absolutely love it. And don't wish it any ill will. (But I DO have to wonder what a good 65" 4k set might look like when that day arrives... ).
I buy the occasional 4k disc for when that day arrives (discs I know I will enjoy seeing in a superior visual presentation). My receiver (a Denon X2000) is ready for 4k passthrough. It's just the display that's holding me back.
The Denon won't, however, give me Atmos audio which is disappointing to me (although I'd have some definite WAF issues if I proposed more speakers in the LR!).
I understand. The only reason we currently have the 4K LG is because it was "now or never" to get a 4K set with 3D capability, which was important to me.It's all about the budget and practicality, Johnny...
Like anything else.
I wish I could have worked an OLED into the budget.Mike, I went from a 55" Panny VT series plasma to a 2016 65" LG OLED. The upgrade was *stunning*. I've been systematically watching by entire Blu-ray collection all over again simply because they look so phenomenal, inherent source quality allowing of course. I haven't regretted retiring the Panny for a single solitary second. If your budget allows...
Whereas, in my case, this may be the ONLY thing in life that I never had to wonder about; but, rather, only dream of.[...]
I DO have to wonder what a good 65" 4k set might look like when that day arrives... ).
[...]
I wish I could have worked an OLED into the budget.
Oh, frabjous day! My UDP-203 arrived last night.
every time I see that, I think of the old HeeHaw phone number BR549
So how do you like the Vizio 70"?Even a normal LED 4K set can be a significant upgrade. An OLED set was out of my budget, too, since I did not want to go any smaller than my old 67-inch Samsung DLP, and 70+ inch OLED sets are very expensive. I went with a Vizio 70-inch LED which had both HDR10 and Dolby Vision support, and have been very pleased with the picture quality for all my sources compared with the old Samsung.
I have an M-Series -- the M70-D3. It's been a great display. The separate calibrations for SDR, HDR10 and Dolby Vision really make the display shine for the price I paid. Vizio's support has been impressive, as well. They introduced a new version of firmware with added functionality which required a new remote control to access that functionality, and they provided that new remote free of charge --including shipping -- to anyone requesting one online. I know it wasn't an expensive remote, but I appreciated that Vizio was taking care of its customers.So how do you like the Vizio 70"?
Is it a M Series Vizio or a more expensive P Series?
For the coming Fall, I'm targeting a Vizio 75" M Series XLED (whatever improvement XLED gives). It will replace my 2013 vintage Vizio 70.
Oh and it will be paired with an Oppo UDP-203.