GregK
Screenwriter
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2000
- Messages
- 1,056
I've read that as well, as he has said something to that effect previously. I know they often (artifically) reduced the original I/A in post for AVATAR, and wish we could seen what some of that looked like before hand. I'm betting AVATAR II will have 3-D depth closer to that of some of the Golden Age (1950s) 3-D titles, based on what Cameron has said so far.MattH. said:I actually read an interview with James Cameron today about his conversion of Titanic, and he claimed that the amount of 3D depth was carefully controlled and deliberately limited with Avatar. He said that the amount of depth was cranked up for the new 3D Titanic to make the lavishness of the ship more demonstrative.
There is one big variable with HUGO and ghosting on certain sets which I had mentioned previously: HUGO is often presented with primary subject matter in negative parallax. This means most of the subject material is placed outside of the stereo 3-D window. This also means it is misconverged (double imaged) most of the time.
So let's say your 3DTV has some mild but noticable ghosting. If most of the primary subject matter is placed at the stereo window (ie: converged / no double image) then said ghosting is not as noticable, and therefore is less objectionable. AVATAR and many of the recent 3-D features tend to have most of the primary subject matter placed at the stereo window. The same goes for many of the 1950s 3-D titles.
But when the primary subject matter is placed outside of the stereo window (and therefore misconverged/double imaged) .. and is done so throughout most of the feature, then it does become more of an issue with 3DTVs which have higher crosstalk (ghosting). But for for a set with excellent L/R 3-D cancellation, it is a non-issue.
I can provide some sample images highlighting convergence differences, should anyone be interested.