What's new

Hubble's Latest Photo Is Unbelieveable! (1 Viewer)

Neil Joseph

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 16, 1998
Messages
8,332
Real Name
Neil Joseph
I would like to see more planet pictures too. The problem is that planets are so close to their sun's that the hubble would get blinded trying to take pictures of the stars. I think if you could turn the star's light off/down momentarily, the hubble could probably get great shots of other planets.
 

Iain Lambert

Screenwriter
Joined
Jun 7, 1999
Messages
1,345
Scott, while attempting to dodge the more religious aspects and speculation, the last time I looked at Big Bang science, the actual spacetime gets created at the same 'time' as its contents. So, in a sense, 'the time before the Big Bang' doesn't have a meaning; its like asking what this IE window was showing before I opened it - it didn't exist to show anything.
 

Dave Morton

Supporting Actor
Joined
Oct 19, 2000
Messages
753
Real Name
Dave
If the laws of physics are true, then matter cannot be created nor destroyed. So, scientfically, all matter always existed. So either randomness or some sort of system is in place to create a steady state where all things can co-exist.
 

CharlesD

Screenwriter
Joined
Mar 30, 2000
Messages
1,493
I think if you could turn the star's light off/down momentarily, the hubble could probably get great shots of other planets.
There are plans for a "nulling interferometer" telescope... its basic principle is to point it at a star and collect light from two or more locations some distance apart. If the instrument is precisely aligned with the target, the light waves from the different receptors will cancel each other out. A light source very close to the target star, but not precisely in line with it will not be canceled out. The aim is to use this instrument to detect light from planets nearby the target star.

The overall effect of such an instrument is essentially to "turn off" the light from a star to see any planets that might be orbiting it.
 

Alex-C

Screenwriter
Joined
Apr 18, 2000
Messages
1,238
And people get frustrated when their latte is a little cold....

Staring at those pics....boy, words escape me !

My fav is that Hubble Deep Space field that shows many galaxies in one picture. The word: amazing doesnt do it justice.
 

Peter Apruzzese

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 20, 1999
Messages
4,905
Real Name
Peter Apruzzese
When the Pathfinder landed on Mars, I was with a group of close friends at a gathering of space enthusiasts in Pasadena, just off the JPL "campus." SF author David Brin was present. His speech has stayed with me in a way that's almost as profound as those first images from what is still the most recent spacecraft to reach the surface of the Red Planet successfully.

The line I remember best is, "We are a great species."

This poignant image from the Hubble Space Telescope is proof positive of the human spirit.
Jack,

Did you ever read Harlan Ellison's essay "Saturn, November 11th" (printed in FutureLife magazine, March 1981 and collected in the volume "An Edge in My Voice")? It details a day spent at, I think, the JPL lab when Voyager was making its closest pass to Saturn and all new information about the rings was coming in. It's a great piece of science reporting and sounds similar to the day you had in Pasadena.
 

Alex S

Second Unit
Joined
Feb 21, 2000
Messages
477
I like this one:
h_hubble_ac_mice_02.jpg

:)
 

Chuck C

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2001
Messages
2,224
Now correct me if i'm wrong....are some of these photos indicative of pictures that artsists could have only dreamed up about ten years ago?
 

Dennis Reno

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jun 30, 1997
Messages
862
The picture Shawn linked to is called "Tadpole". There are dozens of additional galaxies visible in the picture. Absolutely stunning! You can view this image and others HERE. Several are available as wallpaper.
NOTE - I had linked a 640x480 copy of the "Tadpole" image but removed it because of Copyright concerns. Sorry!
 

Jack Briggs

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 3, 1999
Messages
16,805
Peter A: I think I read that piece!

All: About imaging extrasolar planets--please hope with all your heart that NASA's budget is not further emasculated and that the Terrestrial Planet Finder deep-space telescopic/interferometer array does in fact get built, launched, and put into Solar orbit sometime in the next decade. That project, along with the forthcoming Next Generation Space Telescope, represents what humankind can do at its best.

For all the world's troubles, these are indeed exciting times--the most exciting ever, in fact.
 

Bruce Hedtke

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 11, 1999
Messages
2,249
Love the image. It truly is beautiful.

The colors are enhanced and may even be changed to highlight features
I'm not so sure about this. I mean, these colors are all part of the visible spectrum. Color does exist everywhere, even in space.

Bruce
 

Bruce Hedtke

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 11, 1999
Messages
2,249
Also, as to whether Hubble can photograph within out solar system:
Link Removed
(it's Mars)
Bruce
 

Peter Kline

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 9, 1999
Messages
2,393
I understand the colors are indeed decided upon by the processors at NASA. They are based on what the camera image picks up but are enhanced. Doesn't matter. By the way there is an animated version of the two galaxy image showing how they could come together and form a new one. Saw it last night on CNN I believe.
 

Bruce Hedtke

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 11, 1999
Messages
2,249
I understand the colors are indeed decided upon by the processors at NASA. They are based on what the camera image picks up but are enhanced
Actually, now that I've given myself a chance to think about this, it would make sense. Colors are vibrant to us because of our atmosphere and since space lacks an atmosphere, the colors would be muted. My apologies to Ashley for trying to argue a correct assessment :)
Bruce
 

Todd Hochard

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 24, 1999
Messages
2,312
If the laws of physics are true, then matter cannot be created nor destroyed. So, scientfically, all matter always existed.
I believe the whole law is "Matter can neither be created, nor destroyed, only altered in form." Einstein's Theory of Relativity shows the mass->energy equivalent. It is also theorized (and supported) that the sum of all matter and all energy within the universe is zero.
As such, you literally can create something from nothing, because everything=nothing. This sort of thing is demonstrated in nuclear (fission & fusion) reactors- pair production. The interaction of energy within the reactor can create an electron (matter) and positron (a positively charged electron- anti-matter). They were created from the energy present- nothing more. They typically then go on to annihilate one another (matter meeting anti-matter) in short order (10-xx seconds), and the energy is given off. In the end, nothing was created or destroyed, on altered in form.
There was a time when I could give you all supporting mathematical arguments, times, mass-energy numbers, and show you specifically how it occurs. Alas, I forget most of that.:frowning:
Todd
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
357,007
Messages
5,128,244
Members
144,228
Latest member
CoolMovies
Recent bookmarks
0
Top