DaViD Boulet
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Feb 24, 1999
- Messages
- 8,826
Thanks guys :b
Very much appreciated to say the least. I take the feedback I'm getting from you very seriously.
BTW, once you guys get the disc in hand I'd really love for you to post your picture/sound impressions here if you want to discuss them. While I might feel slighted by someone telling me that my impressions were utterly wrong, I in no way feel that a respectful discussion of how the disc looks to different people on different systems is anything at which to take offense.
Also, as some posters of mentioned, this movie appeals to some but not all. I really think it's a lot like Moulin Rouge in that way (which I think is also utterly brilliant but then some people with good movie taste don't seem to like it one bit).
But hey...there's a million DVD titles out there and we can't possibly buy them all so diversity is fine by me.
My perspective of reviewing is that EVERY DVD title, regardless of "worthiness", deserves the very best audio and video transfer possible within the technical limiations of the DVD format (extras are another matter...studios can't afford to load every DVD with a plethora of special features). Inevitably your cult classic will be on someone else's list of "a waste of 2 hours" and so we shouldn't have to worry whether or not the studio felt that the title deserved a good transfer or whether the marketing folks felt that there was a large enough audience to justify doing it right and not using the out-dated transfer in the closet.
Whether or not you love the movie CHICAGO, the folks at Disney have really delivered.
-dave
Very much appreciated to say the least. I take the feedback I'm getting from you very seriously.
BTW, once you guys get the disc in hand I'd really love for you to post your picture/sound impressions here if you want to discuss them. While I might feel slighted by someone telling me that my impressions were utterly wrong, I in no way feel that a respectful discussion of how the disc looks to different people on different systems is anything at which to take offense.
Also, as some posters of mentioned, this movie appeals to some but not all. I really think it's a lot like Moulin Rouge in that way (which I think is also utterly brilliant but then some people with good movie taste don't seem to like it one bit).
But hey...there's a million DVD titles out there and we can't possibly buy them all so diversity is fine by me.
My perspective of reviewing is that EVERY DVD title, regardless of "worthiness", deserves the very best audio and video transfer possible within the technical limiations of the DVD format (extras are another matter...studios can't afford to load every DVD with a plethora of special features). Inevitably your cult classic will be on someone else's list of "a waste of 2 hours" and so we shouldn't have to worry whether or not the studio felt that the title deserved a good transfer or whether the marketing folks felt that there was a large enough audience to justify doing it right and not using the out-dated transfer in the closet.
Whether or not you love the movie CHICAGO, the folks at Disney have really delivered.
-dave