What's new

How do you use the Rat Shack SPL meter? (1 Viewer)

EdNichols

Second Unit
Joined
Feb 15, 2003
Messages
372
I just bought the meter and the instructions say to point the microphone at the source. But my surround speakers are to the side so I don't think I will get a true reading from them. Should I just point the microphone stright up so the sound will be received equally from all the speakers? Also, I know the meter has a certain amount of error in the lower HZ range and I have seen a table to allow for the error when using a the AVIA disk. Does it also apply when using the test tones? To get the sub. to equal the rest of the speakers I have to lower the output quite a bit so should I be allowing for some increase in DB? Any suggestions?
 

DanaA

Screenwriter
Joined
Nov 21, 2001
Messages
1,843
This is the recommended method as per the Home Theater Basics section of the forum.

 

EdNichols

Second Unit
Joined
Feb 15, 2003
Messages
372
Thanks for the info.
Now for my second question, is there an allowance for error on lower hz when using test tones as there is when using a test disc?
 

Bob McElfresh

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 22, 1999
Messages
5,182
Ok - there IS a conversion chart for the Radio Shack SPL meter to compensate for it's in-accuracies to what a standards lab would call XX db.

But you are NOT trying to measure the exact SPL. You are using the meter to compare the SPL from 6 speakers. While the meter is in-accurate from a standards point of view - it's got the same problem for all the speakers. So it works fine for COMPARISON.

(and I can't find a post with the conversion table right now

:frowning:
 

EdNichols

Second Unit
Joined
Feb 15, 2003
Messages
372
Thanks, I have seen that chart. I will try to hunt it down. But I was thinking it only applied to the lower HZ since the meter had a larger error rate in that area. I will find the chart and see!!!
 

Jeff Gatie

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2002
Messages
6,531
Someone asked about the correction factors in Basics and how they applied to "pink noise". The answer to this also applies here:

Pink noise is a sum/average of all frequencies. Most test tones are made of pink noise. The Rat Shack meter correction tables list corrections for specific frequencies (i.e the meter may be -5dB at 25Hz and +2dB at 18 Hz, etc.). Since pink noise is composed of all frequencies - which correction factor are you going to use? The answer - none of them. Vince Maskeeper did a test on this effect and found the correction values really mean nothing when adjusting via pink noise. Just adjust to the proper level on the SPL meter and forget about the correction values.
 

Edward J M

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2002
Messages
2,031
Unlike the surround speaker calibration tone, the subwoofer rumble tone is obviously comprised of a bunch of bass frequencies, largely grouped between 30-45 Hz.

Since the RS meter is C-Weighted, one only needs to look at the C-Weighted frequency response curve to realize that any C-Weighted sound pressure meter will read about 2-3 dB below the actual SPL for any frequencies grouped in the 30-45 Hz region.

A good rule of thumb is to assume any C-Weighted SPL meter will read about 2-3 dB low on the typical subwoofer calibration rumble tone.

The RS meter Correction Factors correct for both the C-Weighted Scale and for inherent inaccuracies of the meter. These inherent inaccuracies start to become significant below 25 Hz.

Here is a chart of the C-Weighted Correction Factors vs. the RS Correction Factors. You can see they are about the same down to 25 Hz, and then they start to diverge significantly.

Regardless, at a minimum the C-Weighted Correction Factors must be applied to even the highest quality SPL meter if it is C-Weighted. The only time you would not use any correction factors for the bass region would be if your equipment is designed to provide a true unweighted response and is rated flat down to at least 10 Hz.

Frequency / C-Weighted CF / RS CF
10.0 / 14.3 / 20
12.5 / 11.3 / 16.5
16.0 / 8.4 / 11.5
20.0 / 6.2 / 7.5
25.0 / 4.4 / 5.0
31.5 / 3.0 / 3
40.0 / 2.0 / 2.5
50.0 / 1.3 / 1.5
63.0 / 0.8 / 1.5
80.0 / 0.5 / 1.5
100.0 / 0.3 / 2
 

EdNichols

Second Unit
Joined
Feb 15, 2003
Messages
372
Edward,

If I understand your chart correctly, the rumble tones of the sub. will be between 30-45 hz and the meter will show them to be approx 2-3 db below actual?
 

Edward J M

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2002
Messages
2,031
Unless you are doing Frquency Response curves, you don't need to worry about the Frequency compensation - as has been said by other posters here.
EdNichols specifically asked in his first post if the RS meter reads low on the Avia subwoofer test tone and if so, should he compensate for it? I guess that would qualify him as "worried" about it in my book.

Straight from the SVS RS Meter FAQ hotlink:

"Because the Radio Shack sound meter is relatively insensitive at very low frequencies you'll actually be set several dBs higher than what's read."

In the end, Ed will set his sub level where it sounds the best - probably a few dB hot for HT, and (hopefully) near flat for music. Regardless, he needs some starting point, and that would be his sound meter and his Avia disc. Now he knows the meter will read a bit low on the sub tone; what he does with this information is up to him.

Regards,

Ed
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
356,968
Messages
5,127,415
Members
144,219
Latest member
zionaesthetic
Recent bookmarks
0
Top