Dave H
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2000
- Messages
- 6,166
Why did LDs always sound better than DVDs? I hear this from everyone who has every compared the two.
They didn't "always" sound better than DVD. That's a myth. They sometimes did, but not "always". The reason that LDs often did sound better or seemed to sound better are as follows:Dave H said:Why did LDs always sound better than DVDs? I hear this from everyone who has every compared the two.
I use a video scaler line quadupler and it looks pretty good.Dean L said:I'm prob gonna get a 42 inch Sony LCD in the next few months.
How do the LD's look on your HDTV's? Do they show a lot of flaws due to the lower rez?
What kind and how much does it cost? I've got a ton of LDs, a CLD-99, and an Infocus SP4800BrandonH said:I use a video scaler line quadupler and it looks pretty good.
http://www.avtoolbox.com/upconpage.shtmlJulian Reville said:What kind and how much does it cost? I've got a ton of LDs, a CLD-99, and an Infocus SP4800
Hardly a myth. As I said, I have at least 400 LDs and at least 200 DVDs. I have found in MOST (if not all) comparisons that the LDs blew away the DVD, in both DD, DTS and PCM. SOME were comparable. Now, I do have a high end system so I can EASILY discern the difference. In no comparison did I find a case where the DVD sounded better.Philip Hamm said:- For stereo soundtracks, LaserDisc offers uncompressed CD quality sound. An equivalent option is available for DVD producers, but is rarely used for various reasons. All else being equal, PCM stereo CD quality sounds better than compressed Dolby Digital stereo. Also, again, since LaserDisc is such a small market there weren't a lot of hands that went into the mastering. Movies usually just got a digital transfer of the Dolby Stereo sounndtrack intended for movie theaters, music videos got similarly raw/un-fudged-with soundtracks.
As a result of both of these scenarios, some PCM stereo soundtracks on LaserDisc can sound really, really good. Particularly if they were originally intended for surround processing in a movie house, they can really kick arse. "Better than DVD"? No. Not unless something's really wrong with the DVD.
The thing that stands out is that the LaserDisc soundtrack is often a closer copy of exactly the sound that was played at the movie theater. A good thing? Probably if you have a relatively high-end system. If not, maybe not.
here I found you one cheaper:Julian Reville said:Super, thank you. I can actually afford that.
I have similar amounts of media and have not notived this "blowing away" effect.Gary Seven said:Hardly a myth. As I said, I have at least 400 LDs and at least 200 DVDs. I have found in MOST (if not all) comparisons that the LDs blew away the DVD, in both DD, DTS and PCM. SOME were comparable. Now, I do have a high end system so I can EASILY discern the difference. In no comparison did I find a case where the DVD sounded better.
That may change with the advent of HD-DVD (and BlueRay).
Now, as an owner of perhaps the only 2.0 AC-3 LaserDisc ever made [the "bonus disc" from a 1998 movie boxset], I can attest that 384 kbps 2.0 is really very good.
Goldeneye?
Perhaps it is as you suggested and more prominent in high end equipment. More of a difference than effect.Philip Hamm said:I have similar amounts of media and have not notived this "blowing away" effect.
Or it's in people's heads, looking to the LD days through rose-colored glasses. Though I could understand the Looney Tunes difference being from the whole DD 2.0 versus PCM problem.Gary Seven said:Perhaps it is as you suggested and more prominent in high end equipment. More of a difference than effect.
Oh yeah... that must be it. :rolleyesPhilip Hamm said:Or it's in people's heads, looking to the LD days through rose-colored glasses.