The fascination for me was seeing Westeros at a period of political, economic, and social stability. That's something we never really got in the main series; even when that show started, Robert Baratheon's rule was tenuous at best.I thought the first episode was just OK. I’ll stick with it and hope it gets better. A little too dark, dull and ugly.
I enjoyed GoT (except for the rushed ending), but even so, I had to admit there was truth to this joke:I enjoyed it because it felt more traditional and understandable. If they try to keep it "small" and not as complicated as GOT so you can follow the story it would be great.
I enjoyed it, but I have a nagging sense right now that this **feels** too much like GoT. Young girl hopping on a dragon to go and save the day? Families squabbling over who marries whom so they can gain a hand in succession?
I'm always up for spending more time in Westeros, but this show has got to stake out its own identity.
I'm always up for spending more time in Westeros, but this show has got to stake out its own identity.
I think part of the problem is that we’re seeing the same locations as in GoT: the Red Keep, Dragonstone, etc.At this point I can't envision what that would even look like, given that we're still operating in the same world. Certain things are familiar, sure, but they don't feel derivative given we're exploring a house that was almost fully eradicated when we meet its surviving members in GoT. Dragon riding is their MO, and any GoT property is going to have family squabbles and political drama...
The first two episodes had so much exposition about characters who've not yet appeared on screen to the point where I feel like I should be taking notes in case it all ends up on a test later.
I suppose the one thing I wish was different was the Crab Feeder doesn't need to be a possibly supernatural weirdo. That seems like trying to be white walker-ish without needing to be.