Help me understand Terminator 2 Extreme's 1080p transfer

RexW

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Apr 10, 2002
Messages
80
Hi all,

I'm eagerly anticipating the new release of Terminator 2 with the 1080p transfer.
I'd appreciate it if anyone could explain (hopefully simply, I've been in Japan for 10 years and the English ability has dropped dramatically

what this 1080p transfer means and the benefits that it will have.
Also, should there be any noticeable improvement on the picture if I'm not using a digital TV or will I need to view this on a 1080p capable TV or projector.

Thanks in advance.
 

Troy LaMont

Supporting Actor
Joined
Mar 11, 1999
Messages
849
Rex,

Just a little confusion....the DVD is mastered from a 1080p HD master. This just boils down to a better, top-notch DVD video transfer. The actual film on DVD is only going to be 480i.

Now, apparently, there's going to be a Windows Media Player 9 HD version packaged in with the DVDs. Nothing official, but you'd need a nice PC to run that on.

Anyway, bottom line is that the new DVD will be light years ahead of any previous versions. No special equipment needed...


Troy
 

RexW

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Apr 10, 2002
Messages
80
Thanks Troy,

That's along the lines of what I was thinking.
Just wanted to make sure of it.
I still am looking forward to seeing it.

Thanks again.
 

Chris Purvis

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Dec 11, 2001
Messages
151
According to Amazon.com, the 1080p WM9 version of the film is official. At least it's listed in the specs on their pre-order page. No word yet on the bitrate, but WM9's HD compression codec is very CPU intesive.
 

Dan Hitchman

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 11, 1999
Messages
2,712
From all reports I've read WM9 media containing Microsoft's Corona video compression codec is VERY CPU and RAM intensive.

Some have recommended a Pentium or equivalent processor of 2.8 GHz and above and more than 512 Megabytes of RAM.

If the clips from Microsoft's website are any indication of Corona's potential at low bitrates and the DVD Forum is considering this codec, we are in trouble here folks when it comes to HD-DVD.

Dan
 

Dan Rudolph

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Messages
4,042
According to IGN's story tongight, it will require a 1.8 GHz Pentium IV or equivelant. Thsi is exactly what I have. Hopefully my 512 MB of memory will be sufficient.
 

NickSo

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2000
Messages
4,260
Real Name
Nick So
I have downloaded some WMV encoded at HD resolutions, my AMD XP1700+ (256MB ram) takes a HUUUUGE hit. While normal uncomressed HD signals run fairly smoothly...
 

Jeremy Conrad

Supporting Actor
Joined
Nov 27, 2000
Messages
529
1.8 is the BARE minimum to run it even slightly smoothly. I was able to get that Motown disc running on a 1.5 Ghz at work, but it'd pause every other minute or so. You also need a load of RAM.
 

Scott L

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 29, 2000
Messages
4,457
I have a sample clip of the WM9 codec (Step Into Liquid trailer - 5.1Mbps, 720p) and it runs super smooth on my p2.4b, 512mb ram. 1080p sounds like a good bit more, but probably comparable bandwidth.

I think anyone with over a 2.2ghz cpu will be ok. If there's slowdown you can always overclock...
 

Eric F

Screenwriter
Joined
Sep 5, 1999
Messages
1,810
1080p WM9 version of the film is official
There's no way a 1080p WM9 compressed film will fit on a single DVD. All the MS guy said on AVSForum that it will be more than 720p, whatever that means- and there are serious doubts about that too. Remember, this is an anamorphic transfer, so nobody's quite clear on what the actual resolution will be- it has to be playable too.

I will be getting Standing in the Shadow of Motown next week, and since that's 4:3 it should be ok, even on my Athlon 1900+.
 

Will_B

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2001
Messages
4,730
I thought they meant there'd be like a 30 second sample or something - why waste space on the disc for something next to noone can use?
 

Marc_E

Supporting Actor
Joined
Oct 9, 2001
Messages
769
Will,
I would not say next to no one. It depends on what the resolution really is but there are people out there that have HTPCs that can handle it. History suggests this to be a good idea because almost nobody could watch DVDs when they were first released and look at them now.
I for one am very excited with my new 2ghz 1gig HTPC and if I have to will overclock or replace the damn processor if need be to get that puppy running on my system!
Marc
 

DaViD Boulet

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 24, 1999
Messages
8,801
We'll just have to wait and see won't we folks.

Who knows...maybe it will demonstrate that we really *can* have full 1080P 24 fps high-quality images on red-laser DVD. We'll just have to wait and see!

dave
 

Jon Hancock

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Mar 18, 1999
Messages
67
There's a lot of folks out there that use HTPC's extensively- in my home, there's two DVD playback systems based on computers (main living room, and my bedroom), and only one using a set top box DVD player (teenage daughter's Toshiba SD9000).

This WM9 release is something anyone with a PC can try out, and obviously, Micro$oft is trying to develop some word of mouth and traction for WM9- they have even submitted it as an encoding/decoding option for HD-DVD.

On my desktop and the HTPC's (all upgraded in the last year, MB's handed down for other applications), the "Step into Liquid" plays quite well, and all though it's not comparable to true transport stream HD (as played through my MyHD card), it's remarkably good for 5 MBs, (with sufficient processor and video power), and generally offers a marked step up in video detail over the high bit rate DVD's- which are running at twice the data rate (thing Superbit releases, or releases like Kevin Costner's WaterWorld, which is typically hovering between 8 and 10 MBits per second). So, I'm very curious to see WM9 at a higher encoded rate; indications from Microsoft are this will be pretty good...

So, this is an interesting bonus they're including, and for that reason alone, I'll buy this release. In fact, this woudl be an interesting clandestine way for Microsoft to build some buzz for WM9, because it's a free download, and anyone with a solid current HTPC could take advantage of it. (this presumes you have the display, too; mine are all 1280X720P capable).

Count me in, I'm jazzed. The HTPC people just don't happen to generally hang out over here, though.

Best regards,

Jon
 

Adam Lenhardt

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2001
Messages
23,417
Location
Albany, NY
Who knows...maybe it will demonstrate that we really *can* have full 1080P 24 fps high-quality images on red-laser DVD. We'll just have to wait and see!
It will demonstate everything but the high-quality part, I'd imagine. All Corona video I've seen so far suffers from very noticable pixelation.
 

Eric F

Screenwriter
Joined
Sep 5, 1999
Messages
1,810

Scott L

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 29, 2000
Messages
4,457
I will be getting Standing in the Shadow of Motown next week, and since that's 4:3 it should be ok...
Eric according to Amazon and DVDEmpire Standing in the Shadows of Motown will be 1.85:1 Anamorphic Widescreen. Are you looking at deepdiscountdvd.com? They have it for cheap but it's 4:3.
 

Forum Sponsors

Forum statistics

Threads
345,182
Messages
4,733,297
Members
141,401
Latest member
Ab1979