What's new

Help: Better Buy- Sony Wega 27" FV17 vs 32" FV27 ? (1 Viewer)

JamesRandall

Auditioning
Joined
Aug 14, 2001
Messages
1
I am just starting to put together a home entertainment center and don't know very much, but wanted to start with a television. I decided to go with a flat-screen Sony Wega (which seems to be the most highly-regarded flat-screen to most I've spoken with, please let me know if this is wrong). My problem, however is deciding between the Sony KV-27FV17 for $750.00 or the KV-32FV27 for $1200.00. That's a good $450.00 difference, and, although I am inclined to get the bigger TV, I can't help but think I'm getting more TV for the money with the 27". The money I save could go to other components, but I want my TV to be the centerpiece.
Could anyone (everyone) give me their opinions on which is a better buy, the primary feature differences between the two (if there are any besides the size), and personal experience with either? I really appreciate it, as I'm going to make the purchase within the next week or so. Thanks!
james
 

Mickey Brown

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Feb 4, 2001
Messages
114
If you're going to be using your wega in a home theater environment, go with the fs-12 or fs-16. You won't be using the speakers on your wega, and you won't need the better comb filter either, as it's bypassed by component inputs.
I picked up a 36 fs 16 at k's merchandise for 1299. Best money I ever spent. The picture is crystal clear with dvd's, and my home theater receiver handles all sound.
 

John Garcia

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 24, 1999
Messages
11,571
Location
NorCal
Real Name
John
I was talking to a salesperson when I bought my KV32FV26 ($1200 shipped, and couldn't be happier), and he mentioned that the picture will be clearer due to the smaller screen size. The pixelation is tighter, and gives a more acurate image. At first, I thought he was FOS, but he had the two sitting there together running off the same source, and the 27 did look more clear. Though neither compared to the XBR450s...
I also noticed that my Panasonic Tau 27" in the bedroom also has a much more clear picture than my WEGA. The Tau lacks many of the features that the WEGA has, but is a very decent set.
IMO, with the WEGAs, don't bother with the -12 or -13. I'd say go with the -27 and be done with it. I say -27 because, though for DVD you would want to use component, other sources, like broadcast will still use the 3d filter. The speakers on the -26 are more than enough, and the -27 has 15W more power.
------------------
All progress is based upon a universal, innate desire on the part of every organism,
to live beyond it's income.
ITRCA ** Link Removed (sorry, car guy)
[Edited last by John Garcia on August 15, 2001 at 01:37 PM]
 

William T

Auditioning
Joined
Dec 26, 1999
Messages
11
I was looking at the 32 or 36 FV27. They have everything I could ask for except for 480p component inputs. From what I gather, this means I can't get any benefit from my Progressive Scan DVD player. I think the cheapest Sony TV with component 480p inputs is the 32 or 36 HS20 flat-tube line.
[Edited last by William T on August 15, 2001 at 10:54 PM]
 

John Garcia

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 24, 1999
Messages
11,571
Location
NorCal
Real Name
John
Yes, for progresive, you will need one of the HS, XBRs or an RP model.
------------------
All progress is based upon a universal, innate desire on the part of every organism,
to live beyond it's income.
ITRCA ** Link Removed (sorry, car guy)
[Edited last by John Garcia on August 15, 2001 at 02:39 PM]
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Forum statistics

Threads
357,051
Messages
5,129,573
Members
144,285
Latest member
blitz
Recent bookmarks
0
Top