Colin-H
Second Unit
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2002
- Messages
- 391
A Q&A with Roger Ebert about this very practice. An excerpt:
Gee, real capitalism where the product has to sell itself.Only in dreams my friend.
I'm the farthest thing from a business man, but I at least understand the whole deal and subtlety behind product advertisement.
But seriously, if people are still pissed off at commericials before films, why won't companies just quit? I mean it, I remember the first time they did this practice and people were just . And they're still doing it!!! Like tele-marketing, companies keep insisting on doing it even though people hate it.
Here in the Bay Area, the AMC Theaters are the worst offenders. I'm talking, 10-15 minutes of commercials prior to the trailers. The Century (Syufy) chain has not adopted the commercial strategy. Instead, we get trailers, which is fine.
But back to AMC: we have to listen to 'hot adult contemporary' and so-called 'R&B' pap for anywhere from 5-10 minutes, then another 10-15 minutes of commercials, some of which include:Precisely why I switched to Century. In Pleasant Hill, Century has a 5-screen arthouse theater in addition to a 16-screen googooplex only a mile away from each other. Great selection and no commercials to speak of.
The nearby AMC was getting worse and worse in regards to commercials (not to mention audiences).
"In this case the cinema actually broke the contract with the audience. I think the compensation for the loss caused by such a delay should be equal to the benefit that the cinema got through screening the adverts."Oh I like that! Maybe lawyers aren't so bad after all....