Amazon fired him!Amazon Studios just suspended Roy Price for sexually harassing a female producer...so we are probably looking at some changes in how business will be conducted.
Amazon fired him!Amazon Studios just suspended Roy Price for sexually harassing a female producer...so we are probably looking at some changes in how business will be conducted.
He stops making money and his studio is perceived to be on a downward course and now it is okay to stab him with their steely knives.
I'm sure there's going to be people who will attack Quentin Tarantino for this and they're not wrong but I have to give the guy some credit for essentially admitting to fucking up. Apparently many people in Hollywood knew about Harvey Weinstein and they did & said nothing for years and after the story came out, they've just claimed ignorance rather than taking any responsibility for their failure. To be clear, I'm not trying to give Tarantino a pass for his inaction but I do think he's being more honest and saying more of value than all of the people who worked with Weinsten for years and their "I have a daughter and I would never..." responses combined.And from the NY Times, an interview with and lengthy statement by Quentin Tarintino: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/19/movies/tarantino-weinstein.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur
Are you suggesting they just can't kill the beast?
That's not really accurate. Pulp Fiction made Quentin Tarantino's career and it made Harvey Weinstein into a mogul. Prior to Pulp Fiction, Miramax was a distributor of art house movies so I doubt that Weinstein was able to strong arm many women into sex by saying "I'm the distributor of Sex, Lies and Videotape! I can break you in this town!" After PF, Weinstein was able to be a degenerate with actual clout and Tarantino could have gone anywhere & could have spoken out against Weinstein as he began to accumulate victims and Tarantino wouldn't have been working in a video store at the end of it.Where would he have been if he had taken a stand as a rising star? Nowhere, that's where. If he had challenged Weinstein about his behavior early in his career, he wouldn't be where he is, apologizing for not coming forward. He would have been back working in a video store, kicking his ass for opening his mouth.
That could be a situation where he's contractually obligated to The Weinstein Company or they have first rights to his script and if they pass, he can go somewhere else.I agree with Travis that it's nice to see QT owning up to this. However, he also stops short in the article of saying "I won't work with The Weinstein Company again," which is interesting.
I want to point out that the above post is neither political nor a conspiracy theory...Jeffrey Epstein was arrested, charged, and convicted...what I mention in the above post is in the public record. I mention it because as more people come out and more people tell their stories I wonder how many people will be taken down by this. It would be great as far as I am concerned if this expands beyond the Hollywood stories into other powerful people victimizing the weak also having to pay for their crimes.
Maybe I'm a chump but I find it hard to believe that there's a cabal of powerful Hollywood people that molest children with impunity. That's not to say that there aren't sick animals in Hollywood and everywhere else that molest kids but an orchestrated decades-long conspiracy (which, due to the length of time, would involve hundreds if not thousands of people) that facilitates and covers it up? That's hard for me to buy.
With Spacey's statement (an absolutely horrendous one, putting the blame on "being gay") more people are going to look deeper into Brian Singer and the others as well. I haven't watched it yet, but it's time to have a look at the Open Secret documentary from a couple of years ago.
Maybe I'm a chump but I find it hard to believe that there's a cabal of powerful Hollywood people that molest children with impunity. That's not to say that there aren't sick animals in Hollywood and everywhere else that molest kids but an orchestrated decades-long conspiracy (which, due to the length of time, would involve hundreds if not thousands of people) that facilitates and covers it up? That's hard for me to buy.
Much like Harvey Weinstein, I think the case of that Epstein creep there is that people ignore the rumors for whatever self-serving reason they choose. Or since it's claims of pedophilia, they ignore it because the potential truth is so horrible that they don't even want to think it's a possibility that a person would do something like that. That New York Post article mentions both a Democratic and a Republican President and one of them I loath and the other I can tolerate but I don't think either one is a pedophile simply because they did business with the guy or went to his island. They just chose to do business with a guy that they most likely knew was an obscenity of a human being. That makes them bad people but it doesn't mean they're a member of a child sex ring.Epstein's (Not Ron, of course) "Lolita Express" has been discussed.
By no means am I trying to say that there's no pedophiles in Hollywood (it's a crime that is terrifyingly under reported) but I doubt it's any more prevalent in Hollywood than anywhere else and I don't see some secret club keeping them all safe.