Group Delay and Damping Factor - IB Application

Discussion in 'Home Theater Projects' started by Edward J M, Apr 30, 2003.

  1. Edward J M

    Edward J M Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2002
    Messages:
    2,031
    Likes Received:
    0
    Maybe I should post this over at the "Cult Of The Infinitely Baffled", but I know some of you frequent both forums.

    I'm helping a friend design a twin Tempest IB subwoofer in his basement (he has an adjacent and completely isolated storage cellar that is perfect).

    We've been discussing transient response and group delay and I'm not sure what these characteristics are in an IB application as compared to a sealed acoustic suspension design.

    Since the IB driver is essentially operating in free air with no enclosure loading, does it take longer for the drive motor and suspension to stop moving after the signal stops? If this is true, would it manifest itself as "bass ring" or "overhang" and is this a common characteristic associated with IB subwoofers?

    Would an amp with a really high damping factor (like a Crown) help minimize this, if it really is concern? Thanks.

    Regards,

    Ed
     
  2. Rick Guynn

    Rick Guynn Second Unit

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 1999
    Messages:
    473
    Likes Received:
    0
    If I understand the concept correctly, (I'm sure Thomas will be along to comment on this anyway [​IMG] ) The damping you are referring to is the system Q. With IB's, the system Q is the same as the Qts of the driver being used. A 'ringing' would seem to indicate an underdamped system. As long as you use a driver with a reasonable Q value, you shouldn't have a problem.

    Oh, and the key to doing this with the Tempest is to run each driver on one voice coil only. You can even 'dial in' the Q by putting a resistor across the second voice coil. Check out the white paper on the subject at Adire's website.

    RG
     
  3. Edward J M

    Edward J M Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2002
    Messages:
    2,031
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks, Rick. I'll look in total system Q and how it relates to the damping of the driver motor. Appreciate the tip on the single coil - we were going to do that, but I like the idea of a variable Q to optimize.

    Ed
     
  4. ThomasW

    ThomasW Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 1999
    Messages:
    2,282
    Likes Received:
    0
    Edward

    IB and dipole designs have the best transient response of all subs that use conventional cone drivers. The only speakers with better bass transient response are planars.

    IMO amps with higher damping factors improve the SQ from subwoofers.
     
  5. Edward J M

    Edward J M Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2002
    Messages:
    2,031
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks, Thomas. Appreciate you getting back to me on this.

    We are proceeding with a basic IB transition box mounted to the wall with twin opposed Tempests. The amp selection is not confirmed, but we were looking at a 2 channel Samson S1000 touring amp rated at 500WPC into 4 ohms or 340 WPC into 8 ohms.

    Ed
     
  6. Javier_Huerta

    Javier_Huerta Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    619
    Likes Received:
    0
    About RDO - something interesting to remember is that, if the Qes of the driver doubles, efficiency drops by 3dB (if I remember correctly).
     
  7. Rick Guynn

    Rick Guynn Second Unit

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 1999
    Messages:
    473
    Likes Received:
    0
    Javier, you are correct. The problem arises (for the Tempest anyway) in that you don't really want to run both voice coils, because then your Q would be ~0.36... way overdamped. So you have to give up some headroom for the SQ.

    RG
     
  8. Brian Bunge

    Brian Bunge Producer

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2000
    Messages:
    3,716
    Likes Received:
    0
    Also keep in mind that you can get drivers specifically designed for IB use from Parts Express. IIRC, the Qts is around .65.
     
  9. Jack Gilvey

    Jack Gilvey Producer

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 1999
    Messages:
    4,948
    Likes Received:
    0
  10. ThomasW

    ThomasW Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 1999
    Messages:
    2,282
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes lower "Q" designs are by defintion over damped. And in theory a "Q" of 0.7 is the 'ideal' driver for IB or dipole use. However I strongly suggest that people compare/experiment to see whether or not they think that there is a significant audible difference between high and low "Q" setups.

    My personal experience is that lower "Q" systems (overdamped systems) sound fine. If a person wants/needs more 'boom' just turn up the volume and or dial in a touch of EQ.
     

Share This Page