What's new

good idea to build Titanic 2? (1 Viewer)

DeathStar1

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2001
Messages
3,267
Real Name
Neil
A few years ago, I remember reading stories about a Titanic 2 being constructed. does anyone know what ever became of it, and do you think it's such a good idea, what with superstition and all :)?
 

Paul McElligott

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2002
Messages
2,598
Real Name
Paul McElligott
I'm pretty sure it went nowhere, just some rich idiot's pipe dream.

I wouldn't name a new ocean liner Titanic any more than I'd want to give the name Arizona to a new warship. More to do with respect than superstition.
 

Jay H

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 22, 1999
Messages
5,654
Location
Pittsfield, MA
Real Name
Jay
What Paul said... I'm sure we could build a fairly safe ship sized proportionately like the titatic to today's cruise ships but it would seem silly psychologically to call it "Titanic 2".

Jay
 

MarkHastings

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2003
Messages
12,013
The current cruise ships are like 33% BIGGER than Titanic, so besides the name, there's no big deal to it.
 

Dennis Nicholls

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 5, 1998
Messages
11,402
Location
Boise, ID
Real Name
Dennis


Actually the Navy has named ships after similar ships sunk in battle. For example, the present fast frigate USS Reuben James is the third such-named ship, the first being the one sunk by U-boat in October 1941.

For that matter, there have been many USS Enterprises (e.g. CV-6, CVN-65), and at least one was destroyed in battle (in 1777).
 

Paul McElligott

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2002
Messages
2,598
Real Name
Paul McElligott
And don't forget NCC-1701, 1701-A, 1701-B... :D

Seriously, there's no problem with naming new ships after sunken vessels. I could support a new liner called "Normandie" or even "Andrea Doria". "Titanic" and even "Lusitania" have such huge losses of life associated with their names that no one will ever want to use them again.

Similarly, the Arizona is practically "hallowed ground" to the Navy, which is why you'll never see another U.S.S. Arizona.
 

Inspector Hammer!

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 15, 1999
Messages
11,063
Location
Houston, Texas
Real Name
John Williamson
Building a second ship like TITANIC would have been a waste of time, anyway, I think that most people would have been too creeped out to sail on a ship that looks identical to a ship that sank and killed 1500 people.

As was said, a pipe dream, that's all it was.
 

Mary M S

Screenwriter
Joined
Mar 12, 2002
Messages
1,544
the diffrence with Titanic, is the public perspective.
Men had the arrogance to advertise her as 'unsinkable.'

to build a Titanic II would be 'asking for it' in parallel.
 

MarkHastings

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2003
Messages
12,013
LOL - for a minute, it sounded like they were going to raise the original ship...and all I kept thinking was: "The Titanic weighed 360 Million pounds???" :laugh:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Forum statistics

Threads
357,037
Messages
5,129,325
Members
144,284
Latest member
Ertugrul
Recent bookmarks
0
Top