Man, what a snooze-fest. Tonight's episode was extremely dull, and just seemed extremely geared for the teens. Usually, it doesn't seem like WB interferes with the show, but this one just seemed so... un GILMORE GIRLS like...
But it was Amy Sherman-Palladino (creator of the show) who wrote this episode. There were plenty of zingers, but the audio just seemed a tad to low compared to the background noise.
I'm liking Jason less and less, but of course, it's setting up an even more overt love triangle for Lorelai with Luke's "marriage" on the rocks.
The Spring Break parts were okay, though the odds of running into Louise and Madeline are pretty high, don'tchathink?
Glen (their driver) is that guy in the latest Burger King commercial where a hottie licks the mayo off another geek's cheek who flubbed her BK order, and "Glen" makes this hilarious "Aaaaaak!!!" sound at the end.
Not the show's best episode; it's a pretty good demonstration of how the show's central axis is Rory-Lorelei-Emily. The episodes where there's not a lot of interaction between the three just aren't the same.
The problem was that Rory and Paris were both just insufferable and it drove me nuts. I know Rory is supposed to be wholesome and Paris an "Intellectual" but I have never seen 2 college students with such little interest in having any fun. Seems like such a waste of college years.
I thought the spring break stuff had potential, but it came off seeming a bit contrived. Luke's call to Lorelai was great, though. "...it's a big white building, you'll recognize it because of the 'Police' sign out front..."
I don't mind the Dean plot but I don't think it would be good to get them back together right now - Rory needs someone else besides her first boyfriend and the guy that treated her like crap. Aren't we supposed to see her grow?
I had read that Amy Sherman-Paladino was having trouble finding a young actor whom she liked as a new boyfriend for Rory. Maybe she's given up and decided to go back to Dean?