Mike Huey
Grip
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2005
- Messages
- 22
Is the practice of very close and confined framing (even with 2.35:1 films) a conscious act stemming from the fact that eventually it'll be seen in full-screen on TV? Sometimes it seems really claustrophobic (although for some it works brilliantly) with the extreme close-ups of the actors faces with little breathing room. What's even worse is when an already tightly framed 1.85:1 film is hard-matted to 2.35:1 in post.
Do you think we'll see an opposite move in the future with more and more people getting bigger widescreen tv's?
Do you think we'll see an opposite move in the future with more and more people getting bigger widescreen tv's?