FCC ruling vis. DTV tuners [merged threads]

Discussion in 'Archived Threads 2001-2004' started by Michael*K, Aug 8, 2002.

  1. Michael*K

    Michael*K Screenwriter

    Joined:
    May 24, 2001
    Messages:
    1,806
    Likes Received:
    0
  2. Mike Broadman

    Mike Broadman Producer

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2001
    Messages:
    4,951
    Likes Received:
    1
    All TVs mandated to have digital tuners by 2007
    I'm surprised how strict the government is getting with this conversion. I also don't see what would be wrong with having the tuner as an option, since many won't be using it (getting their signals through a box).
     
  3. Terrell

    Terrell Producer

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    3,216
    Likes Received:
    0
    I like it. There's no reason for not doing it in my opinion. I think by now they can do it for a reasonable price. This will get more hi-def tvs into consumer's homes, which means faster progression of hi-def DVD.
     
  4. Jeff Kleist

    Jeff Kleist Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 1999
    Messages:
    11,267
    Likes Received:
    0
    They need to amend the order with

    All cable/DBS companies MUST carry ALL digital channels by 2005
     
  5. Ken Chan

    Ken Chan Producer

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 1999
    Messages:
    3,301
    Likes Received:
    0
    Digital tuners do not automatically mean Hi-Def. Heck, Fox is digital, with no Hi-Def in sight. A set with a digital tuner can downconvert HD signals. I dunno what the cost difference is for the other pieces like the tube and so forth to produce 1080i instead of 480i, but if it's just the tuner that must support digital, then the cost will be lower.

    I was also perplexed by this statement:

     
  6. Terrell

    Terrell Producer

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    3,216
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well Ken, that's what they mean. They even made reference to hi-def in the article. The tuners are first to be applied to al 36" and larger TVs. Then, over the next 3 years, all tvs are to be converted.

    This is the statement that I think is right on the money.

     
  7. Gary_E

    Gary_E Second Unit

    Joined:
    May 6, 1999
    Messages:
    366
    Likes Received:
    0
  8. Jesse Skeen

    Jesse Skeen Producer

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 1999
    Messages:
    4,322
    Likes Received:
    226
  9. Thomas Newton

    Thomas Newton Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 1999
    Messages:
    1,519
    Likes Received:
    29
    CNET - FCC Pushes Digital TV Adoption (and anti-recording flags that would "permit consumers to record broadcasts only in lower-quality analog or encrypted digital formats.")
    This doesn't look good either for home recording rights (Supreme Court Betamax ruling? What Betamax ruling?), or for people who have bought HDTV-ready sets with unencrypted analog component inputs.
     
  10. Jeff Ulmer

    Jeff Ulmer Producer

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 1998
    Messages:
    5,584
    Likes Received:
    0
    If it doesn't extend to cable, it doesn't mean much.

    It would suck for those like myself who have a "digital ready" TV if it isn't compatable. It could mean going after the manufacturers for a fix.

    As for the recording flags, to my knowledge there was nothing in the Betamax ruling that said the right to timeshift meant it had to be in the highest possible quality.
     
  11. BobV

    BobV Second Unit

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 1999
    Messages:
    275
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't support this move (being from Canada even [​IMG] ) for many of the same reasons the CEA lays out in the following press release:
    http://www.ce.org/press_room/press_r...l.asp?id=10011
    Here's a couple of excerpts:
     
  12. Jim_C

    Jim_C Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2001
    Messages:
    2,058
    Likes Received:
    13
    I think anything, no matter how small, that helps to move the transition forward is a good thing.
     
  13. Wayne Bundrick

    Wayne Bundrick Cinematographer

    Joined:
    May 17, 1999
    Messages:
    2,358
    Likes Received:
    0
    Two out of the three factions in the TV industry now have FCC mandated timetables for digital TV. The cable industry is the third and I think they're long overdue some regulatory pimpslapping.
     
  14. Terrell

    Terrell Producer

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    3,216
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  15. Thomas Newton

    Thomas Newton Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 1999
    Messages:
    1,519
    Likes Received:
    29
     
  16. Will_B

    Will_B Producer

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2001
    Messages:
    4,731
    Likes Received:
    1
    Toss the digital tuners. Just demand that a certain percentage of monitors (computer monitors) and televisions are 6:9 shaped. Microsoft should be asked to support that shape monitor, if their new operating systems do not already have that feature.
     
  17. todd s

    todd s Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 1999
    Messages:
    7,131
    Likes Received:
    74
    Is their anyone(that has influence w/congress) to have them include Cable companies???

    ps-Excuse my ignorance. But, how is this affect Dish Network or Directv??
     
  18. Michael St. Clair

    Joined:
    May 3, 1999
    Messages:
    6,001
    Likes Received:
    0
    Unfortunately, these required tuners will not tune QAM (the de facto modulation standard) SD and HD digital cable.

     
  19. Michael St. Clair

    Joined:
    May 3, 1999
    Messages:
    6,001
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  20. MickeS

    MickeS Producer

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2000
    Messages:
    5,058
    Likes Received:
    1
    I agree that the first thing that needs to be done is to force cable companies to carry DTV channels. If that happens, there won't have to be a special requirement on manufacturers, people will start asking for TV's that can show them the new programming. It's in the content side where things like these really begin, IMO.

    /Mike
     

Share This Page