What's new

TravisR

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2004
Messages
44,071
Location
The basement of the FBI building
Today with "franchise films and sequels" I think that the goal is not to have them stray from whatever formula they feel made the earlier pictures work. So, I am not so sure that today they would accept a shift away from Micheal Meyers to an evil Irish mask maker.
After 40 years of Michael being the face of that series, you're probably right but I think if Halloween had been made in the last few years, they might have been able to transition to a series of different scary movies each year.


I think you are right that we see some of this with TV shows but I think they take far more risks with TV these days than they do with movies. Basically with TV and all the streaming stuff they actually do seem to be pursuing new ideas to create new content. With movies they seem to only want to recycle content...unless you get an Amazon or Netflix backing you then again they seem interested in original content...literally filling the space vacated by motion pictures.
Unfortunately, I can't argue with that.
 

Winston T. Boogie

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 31, 2004
Messages
13,262
Location
Agua Verde
Real Name
Pike Bishop
The problem was, if they wanted to have a "Halloween" franchise with different stories, they should have started with Halloween II. By having the second film as a continuation of the first, they set the pattern, so audiences expected another continuation with Part III. If they'd used the story for "Season of the Witch" as Halloween II, it might have worked.

They're sort of doing this now with the core of the Conjuring series (excluding the spinoffs). Each film is following a different "case" of the Warrens, with the Warrens themselves as the only real link between the films.

I think The Conjuring idea of covering different cases from the Warrens is interesting and a good one. Funny that they are stuck calling all of the films in the main series The Conjuring as a better name for the series would be something like The Warren Files...but maybe that's more a TV name. I have not watched any of the Annabelle or The Nun spinoffs but they seem to want to keep rolling with those as well.

I think it is always kind of interesting how they approach a sequel or in today's terms it seems "building a universe" which seems to mean they will make as many films as possible that relate to just about anything in a previous film.

I thought the shift to Irish mask maker after two Micheal Myers films was perfect timing to shift away from the whole Haddonfield side of Mike's stalk and kill yarn. But hey, who am I to say?
 

Winston T. Boogie

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 31, 2004
Messages
13,262
Location
Agua Verde
Real Name
Pike Bishop
Ellen Burstyn was the best thing in The Exorcist and without her it doesn’t make sense and was doomed from the get go.

I believe that Burstyn was asked and either was not available or turned it down. I do think Burstyn would have been better to have in a sequel to The Exorcist than Linda Blair...who honestly could have been left out of a sequel entirely or had a minor part.

In truth the actual sequel to The Exorcist is Blatty's film wrongly titled Exorcist III...it should be called Legion. It may be the third in the series of films but it is actually the follow-up to The Exorcist.
 
Last edited:

Lord Dalek

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2005
Messages
7,441
Real Name
Joel Henderson
In truth the actual sequel to The Exorcist is Blatty's film wrongly titled Exorcist III...it should be called Legion. It may be the third in the series of films but it is actually the follow-up to The Exorcist.

Oh really? I thought Exorcist II was actually called "The Ninth Configuration". ;)
 

Winston T. Boogie

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 31, 2004
Messages
13,262
Location
Agua Verde
Real Name
Pike Bishop
Oh really? I thought Exorcist II was actually called "The Ninth Configuration". ;)

Well, yes the astronaut in The Ninth Configuration is meant to be the one Regan says “You’re gonna die up there.” to...so I think the proper way to put it in today’s terms is “It’s in the same universe.” :laugh:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum statistics

Threads
360,728
Messages
5,221,123
Members
145,069
Latest member
stanrozenfeld
Recent bookmarks
0
Back
Top