Peter Kline
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 1999
- Messages
- 2,393
March 6, 2002
UIP questions new rating for 'E.T.' Aussie re-release
March 06, 2002
From Hollywood Reporter:
MELBOURNE, Australia -- Controversy has erupted over the rating of "E.T. the Extra Terrestrial (20th Anniversary Edition)," which is being released in Australian cinemas over the upcoming Easter vacation. On its original release in 1982, "E.T." received a G classification, a category that refers to material deemed suitable to all viewers. But after considering the 20th anniversary edition, the Office of Film and Literature Classification has rated the film PG, which means that parental guidance is recommended for children under the age of 15. The reason for the change, according to an OFLC news release issued Tuesday, is that "in reflecting contemporary community standards across all classifiable elements of the film, the supernatural themes and language could not be currently accommodated at the G level of classification." The film's distributor, United International Pictures, has described the verdict as "baffling" and has asked that the decision be reviewed. (Lawrie Zion)
UIP questions new rating for 'E.T.' Aussie re-release
March 06, 2002
From Hollywood Reporter:
MELBOURNE, Australia -- Controversy has erupted over the rating of "E.T. the Extra Terrestrial (20th Anniversary Edition)," which is being released in Australian cinemas over the upcoming Easter vacation. On its original release in 1982, "E.T." received a G classification, a category that refers to material deemed suitable to all viewers. But after considering the 20th anniversary edition, the Office of Film and Literature Classification has rated the film PG, which means that parental guidance is recommended for children under the age of 15. The reason for the change, according to an OFLC news release issued Tuesday, is that "in reflecting contemporary community standards across all classifiable elements of the film, the supernatural themes and language could not be currently accommodated at the G level of classification." The film's distributor, United International Pictures, has described the verdict as "baffling" and has asked that the decision be reviewed. (Lawrie Zion)