Kaskade1309
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2020
- Messages
- 6,253
- Real Name
- S
Gotcha; thank you.I was talking about Earthquake.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gotcha; thank you.I was talking about Earthquake.
Ok the last time it was the "original" Sensurround audio, it was a dual mono mix with a kinda weak LFE channel as opposed to the original LCR+LFE mix. On the other hand, the "5.1 remix" appeared to be that stereo mix as the rears were dead silent and the LFE was much, MUCH stronger. I suspect we'll be getting this again.
Also I'll be surprised if they include the original Warning Screen that the Shout blu-ray had.
It was the 2.1 track with supposedly Sensurround audio and was completely pointless.Gonna pick up the standard 4K case, not the steelbook. Not enough of a fan, really.
Did anyone ever sample the 2.0 "Sensurround" track on the previous Blu-rays? Was it effective?
No it wasn’t effectiveNo, you never heard it, or no it wasn't effective?
Thanks; my apologies -- I didn't see your original post.I'll just quote myself:
You're referring to the Shout Select BD release, I assume? Or was it Universal's own?I recently watched the BD of Earthquake in my HT (2.40:1 on my 144" wide 2.76:1 curved screen) which was chock full of absolutely terrible opticals that pretty much took me out of the movie.
I wonder what, if anything, the 4K transfer is doing about that????
Right -- 2.1. Sorry. Encoded in DTS-HD MA, if I'm not mistaken, correct?It was the 2.1 track with supposedly Sensurround audio and was completely pointless.
Seems to be the consensus; thanks for the confirmation.No it wasn’t effective
The Universal release. I was listening to the DTS HD MA 5.1 track. If I recall correctly, the original prints were 4 track (LCR Surround) magoptical with the sensurround effect keying done via tones on the optical track.You're referring to the Shout Select BD release, I assume? Or was it Universal's own?
Either way, I don't think this film and its optics are going to ever look great on a screen of your size. Luckily (in this case, at least), my significantly smaller television system will likely mask the shortcomings of the special effects and transfer errors.
I'll keep this in mind when viewing (eventually) the 4K disc...The Universal release. I was listening to the DTS HD MA 5.1 track. If I recall correctly, the original prints were 4 track (LCR Surround) magoptical with the sensurround effect keying done via tones on the optical track.
Thanks for the feedback, Rich -- I will bear this in mind when choosing tracks (eventually) on the UHD version.Agree with the above. I had to switch to the 5.1 mix to get the desired shaking of my home theatre.
Nothing.I recently watched the BD of Earthquake in my HT (2.40:1 on my 144" wide 2.76:1 curved screen) which was chock full of absolutely terrible opticals that pretty much took me out of the movie.
I wonder what, if anything, the 4K transfer is doing about that????